Rebar Protective Cap With Timber Channel And Elastic Fins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective devices for steel reinforcing bars in construction sites are either too time-consuming to install, prone to dislodgment, or require additional tools and fixings, failing to adequately secure timber and thus reintroduce impalement risks.

Innovation Solution

A protective cap with a tubular socket and perpendicular channel for timber, featuring resiliently deformable fins for rebar grip and a shock absorber, eliminating the need for screws and ensuring easy, tool-free installation and enhanced impact resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a circular cap with aperture is used to cover rebar ends, then protection against impalement is provided, but the cap requires considerable time to affix to each rebar and can be accidentally dislodged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The protective device is divided into two main segments: a cap portion that fits over the rebar end and a base portion that remains on the rebar. This segmentation allows the cap to be quickly placed and removed for reuse, while the base remains fixed, significantly reducing installation time while maintaining protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cap is designed to nest over the base portion, with the cap having an open end that receives the base. This nested configuration allows the cap to be easily attached and detached without requiring additional fasteners, reducing installation time while ensuring the protection structure remains secure when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If individual caps are provided for every exposed rebar, then protection is provided, but a large number of caps must be made available and considerable time spent affixing caps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverageVSAvoidinstallation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The base portion is designed as a universal component that can remain on the rebar while the cap is removed and reused on multiple different rebars. This multi-functionality allows a single base-cap pair to protect multiple rebar ends over time, reducing the total number of components needed and improving installation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of repair

If caps are repeatedly reused, then resource efficiency is improved, but friction between caps and rebar ends is reduced causing caps to be easily dislodged

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereusabilityVSAvoidgrip strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is designed with dynamic characteristics that allow it to be easily removed from one rebar and attached to another. The cap's friction-based attachment is sufficient for protection but allows controlled removal, enabling reuse while maintaining reliable protection when properly assembled. The dynamic design accepts that some friction loss occurs with reuse but compensates through the permanent base anchor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the protective device into a reusable cap and a permanent base, the system allows the cap to be repeatedly removed and reused on different rebars while the base remains fixed. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing cap reuse without compromising overall protection reliability, as the base provides the secure anchor point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If timber is laid in caps and screwed in place, then timber is secured, but additional tools and fixings are required and timber might still be borrowed for alternative use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimber securityVSAvoidfixing mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective cap and timber support function are merged into a single integrated device. The cap structure itself provides both protection for the rebar end and support for the timber, eliminating the need for separate screw fixings and additional tools. This merging reduces device complexity while maintaining timber security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides quick, secure, and reusable protection for rebar ends without additional tools, reducing the risk of impalement injuries and maintaining effectiveness even after repeated use.

Implementation Method 1

resiliently deformable fins for rebar grip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

friction between the rebar and the interior surface of the aperture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

shock absorber, eliminating the need for screws and ensuring easy, tool-free installation and enhanced impact resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP3036383B1Safety device
Publication Date: 2018.12.12 GREEN WARREN PAUL
  • EP3036383B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3036383B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3036383B1 patent drawingFigure 7

AI summary

A protective cap, for preventing impalement injury on rebar, comprising a tubular socket to receive an end of a length of rebar, the socket being attached to a sleeve defining a channel to receive and enclose a length of timber. Caps are also provided having a releasable gripper to grip the end of rebar.