Reinforcing Bar Composition for High Strength and Seismic Ductility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reinforcing bars do not meet the demand for ultra-high strength and seismic performance while maintaining cost-effectiveness and productivity, as they require excessive alloying elements that increase production costs.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcing bar composition with controlled amounts of carbon, silicon, manganese, chromium, vanadium, copper, molybdenum, aluminum, nickel, tin, phosphorus, sulfur, and nitrogen, along with a microstructure of tempered martensite, ferrite, pearlite, and bainite, achieved through a manufacturing process involving reheating, hot-rolling, and controlled cooling to form a hardened core layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If excessive alloying elements are added to increase plastic deformation capacity and seismic performance, then the seismic performance is improved, but the production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic performanceVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters by precisely controlling the content ranges of multiple alloying elements (C: 0.10-0.45%, Si: 0.50-1.00%, Mn: 0.40-1.80%, Cr: 0.10-1.00%, V: 0.00-0.20%, Cu: 0.00-0.40%, Mo: 0.00-0.50%, Ni: 0.00-0.25%, Al: 0.015-0.070%). This parameter optimization achieves the required plastic deformation capacity and seismic performance while avoiding excessive alloying that would increase production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If reinforcing bar strength is increased to meet future demands of 1.0 GPa or greater, then the strength is improved, but the complexity of achieving both strength and ductility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield strengthVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (ferrite, pearlite, bainite, and martensite) within the steel matrix. This composite microstructure enables the reinforcing bar to achieve ultra-high yield strength (≥1.0 GPa) while maintaining adequate ductility and seismic performance, avoiding the need for overly complex processing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If plastic deformation capacity is increased through alloying elements, then the seismic performance is improved, but the production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic deformation capacityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the content parameters of multiple alloying elements to achieve the required plastic deformation capacity. By controlling C at 0.10-0.45%, Si at 0.50-1.00%, Mn at 0.40-1.80%, and other elements within specified ranges, the steel achieves adequate elongation and plastic deformation capacity for seismic performance without excessive alloying that would increase production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a reinforcing bar with yield strength of 700 MPa or greater, a TS/YS ratio of 1.25 or greater, and excellent seismic performance, while reducing alloying element usage and simplifying processes, thereby delaying structural collapse during earthquakes and reducing construction costs.

Implementation Method 1

the surface layer portion includes tempered martensite, and the central portion is composed of a microstructure including ferrite, pearlite and bainite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

manufacturing a rolled material by hot-rolling the reheated semi-finished product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

reheating a semi-finished product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

cooling the rolled material to the Ms temperature or below

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12497669B2Ultra-high-strength reinforcing bar and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 HYUNDAE STEEL CO LTD
  • US12497669B2 patent drawing
  • US12497669B2 patent drawing
  • US12497669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an ultra-high-strength reinforcing bar and a method for manufacturing the same are disclosed. In an exemplary embodiment, the ultra-high-strength reinforcing bar includes an amount of 0.10 to 0.45 wt % carbon (C), an amount of 0.5 to 1.0 wt % silicon (Si), an amount of 0.40 to 1.80 wt % manganese (Mn), an amount of 0.10 to 1.0 wt % chromium (Cr), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.2 wt % vanadium (V), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.4 wt % copper (Cu), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.5 wt % molybdenum (Mo), an amount of 0.015 to 0.070 wt % aluminum (Al), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.25 wt % nickel (Ni), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.1 wt % tin (Sn), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.05 wt % phosphorus (P), an amount greater than 0 and less than or equal to 0.03 wt % sulfur (S), an amount of 0.005 to 0.02 wt % nitrogen (N), and the remainder being iron (Fe) and other inevitable impurities.