Received-Power Grouping for OTA Federated Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional over-the-air aggregation in federated learning faces challenges in achieving tight power control among user equipment due to varying distances and channel conditions, leading to unequal received signal magnitudes and inefficient communication costs.

Innovation Solution

A parameter server selects groups of user equipment based on common received power properties, such as pathloss or power budget, to perform over-the-air aggregation, and user equipment performs truncated channel inversion based on power headroom and thresholds for power control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional over-the-air aggregation is used without power control, then device complexity is reduced, but signal magnitude consistency deteriorates due to varying distances and channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control mechanism complexityVSAvoidsignal magnitude consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission power parameters based on channel conditions and received power properties. The parameter server modifies power control parameters for each UE based on its received power characteristics, enabling consistent signal magnitudes at the parameter server while managing device complexity through coordinated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where UEs report power headroom and received power properties to the parameter server. Based on this feedback, the parameter server adjusts power control parameters and selects appropriate UEs for aggregation sessions, ensuring signal consistency without requiring complex local power control at each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If power control is implemented to ensure consistent signal magnitudes, then communication efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to power control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidpower control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments UEs into groups based on their received power properties and divides the power control function between the parameter server and individual UEs. The parameter server handles high-level power control decisions while UEs perform localized power adjustments, improving communication efficiency without concentrating all complexity at a single device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The parameter server acts as an intermediary that coordinates power control across multiple UEs. It receives power headroom reports, determines appropriate power levels, and transmits power control parameters to UEs, thereby managing the complexity centrally while maintaining efficient communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If all UEs participate in over-the-air aggregation, then communication cost is reduced, but power control difficulty increases due to varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication costVSAvoidpower control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns different roles and power control parameters to different UEs based on their individual channel conditions and received power properties. UEs with better channel conditions may be selected for aggregation while others provide feedback or assist in power control, enabling inclusive participation without uniformly increasing power control difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system selectively includes UEs in over-the-air aggregation sessions based on their power properties and channel conditions. Not all UEs must participate in every session, allowing the system to achieve sufficient communication efficiency while avoiding the excessive complexity of coordinating all devices simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12445979B2Power control in over the air aggregation for federated learning
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12445979B2 patent drawing
  • US12445979B2 patent drawing
  • US12445979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parameter server located at a base station may coordinate federated learning among multiple user equipment (UEs) using over-the-air (OTA) aggregation with power control to mitigate aggregation distortion due to amplitude misalignment. The parameter server may select a first group of UEs for a first OTA aggregation session of a federated learning round based on a common received power property of each UE in the first group of UEs. The parameter server may transmit a global model to the first group of UEs. Each UE in the first group may train the global model based on a local dataset and transmit values associated with the trained local model. The parameter server may receive, on resource elements for the first group of UEs, a first aggregate amplitude modulated analog signal representing a combined response from the first group of UEs.