Receiver-Assisted LBT Beam Indication for Hidden Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless communication systems face challenges in accurately detecting interference proximate to the receiving device due to non-uniform interference along the wireless channel, particularly exacerbated by beamforming techniques, leading to potential transmission failures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing receiver-assisted listen-before-talk (LBT) procedures where the receiving device performs LBT on a specified beam and indicates the results to the transmitting device, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of interference detection in unlicensed bands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the transmitting device performs clear channel assessment (CCA) to detect interference, then the transmitting device can identify potential interference in its environment, but the transmitting device may fail to detect interference in an environment proximate to the receiving device due to non-uniform interference conditions and beamforming techniques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference detection accuracyVSAvoidLBT procedure reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional LBT approach by having the receiving device perform CCA instead of the transmitting device. The receiving device uses its receive beam to sense the channel and detect interference in its local environment, providing accurate channel status information to the transmitting device. This inversion resolves the contradiction by ensuring interference detection is performed from the perspective of the receiving device, which directly impacts transmission reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a receiver-assisted LBT mechanism where the receiving device acts as an intermediary to perform channel sensing. The receiving device senses the channel using its receive beam and reports the channel status to the transmitting device, which then uses this information for transmission decisions. This intermediary approach allows the transmitting device to make informed decisions based on actual receiving environment conditions, resolving the contradiction between detection accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If beamforming techniques are used to improve signal directionality, then communication reliability is improved, but the 'hidden node' and 'exposed node' problems arise due to non-uniform interference conditions in different beam directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidinterference detection adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by having the receiving device perform CCA using its receive beam to detect interference in the specific spatial direction relevant to the communication link. Each beam direction has its own interference characteristics, and the receiving device senses the channel quality locally in its beam direction. This localized sensing approach resolves the contradiction by adapting interference detection to the specific beam direction and spatial characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic beam indication where the receiving device is instructed to sense the channel using a receive beam corresponding to a transmit beam that will be used for data transmission. The system dynamically adapts the sensing beam to match the intended transmission beam, ensuring that interference detection is performed in the correct spatial direction. This dynamic adaptation resolves the hidden node and exposed node problems by aligning the sensing direction with the transmission direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the transmitting device performs LBT procedure, then it can attempt transmission in unlicensed bands, but it may fail to detect interference that would prevent the receiving device from successfully receiving the transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having the receiving device perform CCA and report the channel status to the transmitting device. The receiving device senses the channel using its receive beam and provides feedback information about the detected interference level and channel quality. The transmitting device uses this feedback to make informed transmission decisions, resolving the contradiction by ensuring that transmission attempts are based on accurate receiving environment information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the receiving device perform channel sensing before the transmitting device initiates data transmission. The receiving device senses the channel in advance and reports the results, allowing the transmitting device to prepare appropriate transmission parameters or defer transmission if interference is detected. This preliminary sensing action resolves the contradiction by ensuring interference detection occurs before transmission decisions are made.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12634990B2Receiver-assisted listen-before-talk procedures with explicit beam indication
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12634990B2 patent drawing
  • US12634990B2 patent drawing
  • US12634990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example aspects include a method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for wireless communication at user equipment of a mobile network, comprising receiving, from a base station via a first beam, a pre-grant message requesting the UE to perform a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure on a second beam. The aspects further include performing, according to the pre-grant message, the LBT procedure on the second beam. Additionally, the aspects include indicating, to the base station, whether the LBT procedure was successful.