Receiver Sampling for Intersymbol Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-user communication, existing methods face challenges in efficiently decoding signals with similar power efficiencies and modulation methods, leading to capacity loss and increased complexity due to intersymbol interference, especially when signals are not synchronized in frequency or phase.

Innovation Solution

A receiver design that samples one signal component without intersymbol interference, allowing for reduced complexity in decoding by separating and processing the signals based on their probability density functions and intersymbol interference properties, using techniques like trellis decoding and discrete convolution to estimate and compensate for interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If successive demodulation and detection is used to separate superimposed signals, then signals with significantly different received power can be decoded, but capacity is lost and complexity increases when signals have similar power efficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal decoding reliabilityVSAvoiddecoder complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver segments the decoding process into two distinct parts: first decoding the first signal component using its dedicated decoder, then using the decoded first signal to reconstruct and subtract interference from the second signal component before decoding it. This segmentation allows each decoder to handle one signal at a time rather than simultaneously processing multiple signals, significantly reducing overall decoder complexity while maintaining reliability for signals with similar power efficiencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary decoding of the first signal component before attempting to decode the second signal component. By first decoding the stronger or more reliably received signal, the system can reconstruct its interference contribution and remove it from the composite signal, thereby preprocessing the second signal to eliminate intersymbol interference from the first signal before decoding begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If optimal multi-user receiver is used to interpret superimposed signals, then all data symbols can be detected, but capacity decreases drastically due to equivalent modulation creating up to M^N signal elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata symbol detection accuracyVSAvoidchannel capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of treating the superimposed signal as a single complex modulation with M^N possible symbols, the system segments the detection process into two separate detection stages. Each stage uses a standard M-ary decoder rather than an exponentially complex M^N decoder, thereby maintaining channel capacity at practical levels while still achieving reliable detection of all data symbols through sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separately processes the first signal component from the superimposed signal before processing the second signal component. By taking out the first signal, decoding it separately, and then removing its interference contribution, the system avoids the need to process all M^N combined signal elements simultaneously, thereby preserving channel capacity while achieving complete symbol detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If signals are sampled without intersymbol interference, then decoding complexity is reduced, but this requires precise synchronization that is difficult to achieve when signals have different frequencies or phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoder complexityVSAvoidsignal synchronization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the signal processing into two independent decoding paths, each with its own synchronization requirements. The first decoder processes the first signal component with its own timing and phase reference, while the second decoder processes the second signal component after interference removal. This segmentation allows each decoder to be optimized for its specific signal without requiring perfect synchronization between the two signals, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3756290B1Receiver, transmitter, method and system for receiving and sending a combination signal
Publication Date: 2022.07.27 INNOVATIONSZENTRUM FUER TELEKOMMUNIKATIONSTECHNIK GMBH IZT
  • EP3756290B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3756290B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3756290B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A receiver for receiving a combination signal having two separate signal portions, the pulses of which are shifted relative to one other and/or the carrier waves of which have a phase difference.. The receiver has a filter matched to a transmission pulse form of the pulses of at least one of the signal portions and is designed to set sampling time points at which an output signal of the filter is sampled such that an output signal portion, based on one of the signal portions, of the filter is sampled substantially without any intersymbol interference.