Receiver Signal Processing Mode Switching for Power Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In high-speed communication systems, traditional signal processing techniques for data recovery from channel signals consume significant power, which is problematic in power-limited environments such as energy-efficient data centers or mobile devices.

Innovation Solution

A receiver that operates in different signal processing modes based on channel signal quality, using a quantization circuit to generate a quantized code, and switching between a low power mode with simple decision circuits and a high power mode with advanced decision circuits, controlled by a signal quality detector to optimize power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional signal processing techniques are used for data recovery, then data recovery accuracy is maintained, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver dynamically switches between different signal processing modes (first mode with first decision circuit, second mode with second decision circuit) based on real-time signal quality assessment. When signal quality is good, the system uses the lower-power first decision circuit; when signal quality degrades, it transitions to the more powerful second decision circuit to maintain data recovery accuracy. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting processing intensity to match actual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (signal processing complexity, decision circuit selection) based on signal quality parameters. The controller monitors signal quality metrics and adjusts the processing mode accordingly, transitioning between different decision circuits with varying computational complexity and power consumption characteristics. This parameter-based adaptation allows the system to maintain reliability while optimizing power usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If advanced signal processing modes are always enabled, then data recovery accuracy is maintained under all conditions, but power consumption increases continuously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidbaseline power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of always applying full advanced signal processing, the system applies processing intensity proportional to actual needs. The first decision circuit handles typical conditions with sufficient accuracy, while the second decision circuit is activated only partially (when needed) for degraded signal conditions. This partial action principle reduces baseline power consumption while maintaining reliability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates different levels of signal processing capability into distinct decision circuits. The essential data recovery function is provided by the first decision circuit at lower power, while advanced processing capabilities are extracted into a second decision circuit that is only activated when necessary. This extraction allows the system to operate at low power normally while having advanced capabilities available when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Use of energy by moving object

If simple decision circuits are used to reduce power consumption, then power efficiency improves, but data recovery accuracy deteriorates under poor signal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoiddata recovery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts decision circuit selection based on signal quality. The first decision circuit operates during normal conditions to maintain power efficiency, while the controller monitors signal quality and dynamically switches to the second decision circuit when degradation is detected. This dynamic switching ensures power efficiency is maintained during typical operation while reliability is preserved when signal conditions worsen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback through signal quality monitoring to control decision circuit selection. The controller continuously assesses signal quality metrics and uses this feedback to determine whether to use the power-efficient first decision circuit or the more capable second decision circuit. This feedback mechanism ensures that power efficiency is optimized during good conditions while reliability is maintained when signal quality deteriorates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11349689B2Receiver for high speed communication channel
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 ETOPUS TECH
  • US11349689B2 patent drawing
  • US11349689B2 patent drawing
  • US11349689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver for data recovery from a channel signal of a communications channel. The receiver includes a quantization circuit to generate a quantized code corresponding to the channel signal. A first decision circuit recovers, in a first signal processing mode, digital data for the channel signal based on the quantized representation of the channel signal. A second decision circuit recovers, in a second signal processing mode, the digital data for the channel signal based on the quantized representation of the channel signal. A controller selects between the first signal processing mode and the second signal processing mode based on a parameter indicative of a signal quality of the channel signal.