Receptance Coupling for Tool Point Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting tool point responses and generating stability lobe diagrams in high-speed machining require extensive testing and are not practical for production environments, as they depend on dynamic models that change with new tool or holder combinations, necessitating repeated measurements.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for predicting tool point responses by determining displacement-to-force receptances of a standard holder, decomposing it into subassemblies using inverse receptance coupling, and simulating the spindle-holder-tool assembly to generate stability lobe diagrams with minimal input, allowing for prediction of tool point dynamics and stability zones without extensive testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If impact testing is performed for each spindle-holder-tool combination to obtain dynamic models, then measurement accuracy is improved, but measurement time and productivity are significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool point dynamics measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the spindle-holder-tool assembly into separate components (spindle, holder, tool) and determines receptance characteristics for each component independently. This allows the dynamic model to be built from separate component models rather than requiring complete re-testing of the entire assembly for each combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurements to determine receptance characteristics of the spindle and holder components once, before actual machining operations. These preliminary dynamic models are then reused for multiple tool-holder combinations, eliminating the need for repeated impact testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If dynamic models are updated for every new holder or tool to maintain accuracy, then model reliability is improved, but the complexity and time required for repeated testing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic model accuracyVSAvoidtesting procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal receptance model for the spindle-holder base subassembly that can be used across multiple holder and tool combinations. The standardized holder receptance model serves as a universal component that maintains model reliability without requiring re-testing for each new tool or holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8131525B2System and method for tool point prediction using multi-component receptance coupling substructure analysis
Publication Date: 2012.03.06 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US8131525B2 patent drawing
  • US8131525B2 patent drawing
  • US8131525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting a tool point response of a spindle-holder-tool assembly to be used for high-speed machining applications is provided. The method includes determining direct and cross displacement-to-force receptances of a standard holder clamped in the spindle. The method also includes determining direct receptances at a free end of the standard holder based upon the determined direct and cross displacement-to-force receptances of the standard holder. Additionally, the method includes performing an inverse receptance coupling to simulate a decomposition of the standard holder into multiple subassemblies, the subassemblies including a spindle-holder base subassembly and an extended holder subassembly. The method further includes determining spindle-holder base subassembly receptances based upon the simulated decomposition of the standard holder.