Recessed Gradient Correctors for Cyclotron Beam Focusing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Isochronous sector-focused cyclotrons face challenges in efficiently and cost-effectively extracting a focused and predictable particle beam due to the limitations of protruding gradient correctors, which increase the cyclotron's weight, require more energy for vacuum pumping, and are difficult to precisely position.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a magnet pole with recessed gradient correctors, featuring a concave portion on the upper peripheral edge of hill sectors, which reduces the cyclotron's size and weight, allows precise positioning, and improves magnetic field homogeneity, enabling better control of the particle beam's focusing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If protruding gradient correctors are used to improve beam focusing, then the magnetic field homogeneity is improved, but the cyclotron weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam focusing precisionVSAvoidcyclotron weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding protruding gradient correctors to the hill sector peripheral edges, the invention uses recessed gradient correctors that are coupled to the peripheral surfaces, creating a concave modification rather than a convex one. This inversion approach achieves the same magnetic field correction function while reducing the overall cyclotron weight and volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The gradient correctors are applied locally only at the peripheral edges of hill sectors where magnetic field homogeneity needs improvement, rather than uniformly across the entire magnet pole. This localized application minimizes the added weight while achieving the desired beam focusing effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If protruding gradient correctors are used to improve beam focusing, then the magnetic field homogeneity is improved, but the vacuum chamber volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam focusing precisionVSAvoidvacuum chamber volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the gradient corrector design from protruding to recessed, allowing the correctors to be integrated within the existing vacuum chamber volume rather than requiring external expansion. This reduces the vacuum chamber volume while maintaining the magnetic field correction function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The recessed gradient correctors are nested within the existing hill sector structure and vacuum chamber space, utilizing available volume rather than requiring additional external space. This nesting approach achieves field correction without increasing the overall cyclotron footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Manufacturing precision

If protruding gradient correctors are used to improve beam focusing, then the magnetic field homogeneity is improved, but the positioning precision becomes difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam focusing precisionVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the design to recessed correctors, the positioning reference surface becomes the flat peripheral surface of the hill sector rather than requiring precise positioning of a protruding element. This inversion simplifies the manufacturing and positioning process while maintaining field correction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The recessed gradient correctors are pre-positioned within the hill sector structure during manufacturing, with their positions determined by the fixed geometry of the recesses. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for complex post-installation adjustment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the focusing and predictability of the extracted particle beam, reduces the cyclotron's size and weight, and simplifies the positioning of gradient correctors, leading to more efficient and cost-effective operation.

Implementation Method 1

The magnetic system generates a magnetic field that guides and focuses the beam of charged particles along the spiral path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

A strong magnetic field is thus created in the hill gap portions within the hill sectors and a weaker magnetic field is created in the valley gap portions within the valley sectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

Gradient correctors are relatively small blocks of steel with respect to the size of a hill sector, which are coupled to the peripheral surfaces of the hill sectors. Such gradient correctors allow the modification of the magnetic field near the peripheral edges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field modification: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10278277B2Gradient corrector for cyclotron
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 ION BEAM APPL
  • US10278277B2 patent drawing
  • US10278277B2 patent drawing
  • US10278277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a magnet pole for an isochronous sector-focused cyclotron having hill and valley sectors alternatively distributed around a central axis, Z, each hill sector having an upper surface bounded by four edges: an upper peripheral edge, an upper central edge, a first and a second upper lateral edges, and a peripheral surface extending from the upper peripheral edge to a lower peripheral line. The upper peripheral edge of at least one hill sector may further include a concave portion with respect to the central axis defining a recess extending at least partially over a portion of the peripheral surface of the corresponding hill sector.