Reciprocating Pump Back-Suction Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reagent metering systems for internal combustion engines, particularly those using reciprocating pumps, generate excessive noise during back-suction operations due to the absence of reagent, leading to increased wear and manufacturing costs, and are prone to damage from freezing urea-water solutions.

Innovation Solution

A method that reduces the activation power of the reciprocating pump by determining the flight time of the piston and comparing it to a threshold value, thereby lowering the noise generation during back-suction by reducing the magnetic force and adjusting the pulse-width-modulated signal to maintain efficient reagent suction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a reciprocating pump is used for back-suction operations, then reagent can be effectively suctioned back into the tank, but excessive noise is generated due to the absence of reagent during back-suction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback-suction efficiencyVSAvoidnoise generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pump activation power is dynamically adjusted based on the detected flight time of the reciprocating piston. When flight time indicates low reagent levels, the activation power is reduced to minimize noise from armature impacts, while still maintaining sufficient pumping action for effective back-suction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The activation power parameter of the reciprocating pump is changed based on the flight time measurement. By comparing flight time to threshold values, the system adjusts the pump's activation power to optimize the balance between back-suction efficiency and noise reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the reciprocating pump operates with high activation power, then back-suction is more effective, but wear on the pump components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback-suction rateVSAvoidpump lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The activation power is dynamically adapted based on real-time flight time detection. During back-suction operations, the pump operates at reduced power levels when flight time indicates low reagent conditions, reducing mechanical wear on the armature and piston while maintaining adequate back-suction performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively reduces activation power before severe wear can occur by detecting flight time patterns that indicate low reagent levels. This preventive approach cushions against excessive mechanical stress and extends pump component lifespan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If the urea-water solution is left in the reagent metering system after shutdown, then the system remains ready for quick restart, but damage occurs due to freezing expansion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem readinessVSAvoidfreezing damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs back-suction of the urea-water solution before shutdown or in cold conditions as a preliminary protective action. This prevents freezing expansion damage by removing the reagent from vulnerable components like lines and the metering valve before the system stops operating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potential harm of leftover reagent freezing into a benefit by implementing automatic back-suction. The same reciprocating pump that performs metering also sucks back the reagent, turning a protective function into an integrated operation that eliminates freezing risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces noise during back-suction operations and extends the lifespan of the reciprocating pump by minimizing wear, while preventing damage from freezing reagents through controlled reagent back-suction.

Implementation Method 1

a solenoid actuator, specifically a reciprocating pump, in which an armature surrounded by a solenoid carries out a reciprocating movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

The urea-water solution which is customarily used and is defined in DIN standards has the property of freezing at approximately −11° C. The volumetric expansion of the urea-water solution that is associated with the freezing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS20170058739A1Method for operating a reagent metering system, device for carrying out the method, computer program and computer program product
Publication Date: 2017.03.02 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20170058739A1 patent drawing
  • US20170058739A1 patent drawing
  • US20170058739A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a reagent metering system which meters a reagent into an exhaust duct of an internal combustion engine upstream of an SCR catalytic converter, in which, after the metering operation is ended, at least part of the reagent metering system is emptied by back-suction by means of a reciprocating pump. The procedure according to the invention is distinguished in that during the back-suction, a stop determination determines the flight time of a reciprocating piston of the reciprocating pump from a starting time as far as the stop time, in that a comparator compares the flight time determined with a flight time threshold value, and in that the activation power of the reciprocating pump is reduced if the flight time determined is less than the flight time threshold value.