Recipe Engine System for Personalized Meal Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recipes and cooking resources, such as cookbooks and websites, fail to consider essential parameters like the cook's skill level, available ingredients, preparation time, seasonal appropriateness, and dietary preferences, leading to inefficient and unsuitable meal preparation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that provides personalized electronic meal information by prompting users for their parameters, selecting and generating recipes, and generating an ingredient list, which can be used to purchase ingredients through an e-commerce platform, ensuring recipes are tailored to the user's context and preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional cookbooks and websites provide recipes without considering user parameters, then recipe information is universally available, but the recipes are not tailored to individual needs and result in wasted time and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipe personalizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts recipe recommendations based on real-time user inputs including skill level, available ingredients, time constraints, and seasonal factors. The recipe generation process is not static but adjusts continuously according to user parameters, making the system versatile and personalized while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously to generate personalized recipes: skill level parameter, available ingredients parameter, time constraint parameter, and seasonal parameter. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves high adaptability without requiring complex manual configuration for each user scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If cookbooks provide multiple recipes without consolidating time requirements, then recipe variety is increased, but the total preparation time is underestimated and not adequately planned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeal preparation timeVSAvoidmeal planning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary consolidation of time requirements for all recipes in a meal plan before presenting it to the user. By calculating and displaying the total accumulated preparation time in advance, users can make informed decisions about their meal plans without experiencing time surprises during actual cooking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users about the total time commitment required for their selected recipes. This feedback mechanism allows users to adjust their meal plans based on realistic time assessments, improving both time management and planning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If seasonal recipes are provided in cookbooks, then recipes are appropriate for specific times of year, but ingredients may be unavailable or not fresh in other seasons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseasonal appropriatenessVSAvoidingredient availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts recipe recommendations based on the current season and user-specified seasonal preferences. By incorporating real-time seasonal data and user preferences, the system ensures that recommended recipes use ingredients that are currently available and fresh, eliminating the mismatch between seasonal recipes and ingredient availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If recipes are provided without considering cook's skill level, then recipe accessibility is maximized, but beginners may find recipes too difficult and experienced cooks may find them too simple

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill level adaptationVSAvoidrecipe usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring recipe complexity and detail to the specific skill level of each user. Beginner users receive recipes with more detailed instructions and simpler techniques, while experienced cooks receive more advanced recipes with less hand-holding. This localized adaptation ensures optimal usability for each user's skill level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Adaptability or versatility

If individual recipes are sourced from multiple independent sources, then recipe variety is increased, but the complete meal may not have coherent flavor profiles or complementary dishes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipe source diversityVSAvoidmeal coherence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple recipe selections into a coherent complete meal plan by evaluating flavor profiles, ingredient compatibility, and course sequencing. Rather than simply aggregating independent recipes, the system integrates them into a unified meal composition that ensures coherence and complementarity across all courses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8200548B2Recipe engine system and method
Publication Date: 2012.06.12 WIEDL PETER
  • US8200548B2 patent drawing
  • US8200548B2 patent drawing
  • US8200548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system and method for providing electronic meal information to a user. At least one database stores recipe information, recipe attribute information process information and time information for recipes. A web site linked to the Internet includes a prompt for a user to submit at least one characteristic of a meal and another prompt for available ingredient information. Recipe information is generated by a selection of at least some of the stored electronic recipe information that corresponds to the characteristic of the meal and the available ingredients. An electronic list of ingredients is generated that includes the difference between ingredients for the meal, and the at least one ingredient that the user has available for the meal.