Manufacturing Recipe Recommendation Using Hybrid AI and Physics Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The die casting process faces high scrap rates due to unoptimized process parameters, environmental conditions, machine conditions, and maintenance issues, which are not effectively captured by existing physics-based-simulation models, leading to low accuracy in recipe optimization.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method integrating a physics-based-simulation model with an AI/ML model to generate and validate recipes by analyzing experimental data, including sensor data and metadata, to determine optimized physical ranges of parameters, thereby recommending improved recipes for producing products in manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If physics-based-simulation is used to optimize process parameters, then manufacturing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates because environmental conditions, machine conditions, and maintenance parameters are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipe optimization accuracyVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges physics-based-simulation with machine learning models to create a hybrid system. The physics-based-simulation provides fundamental process understanding and predictions, while the machine learning model learns from experimental data including environmental conditions, machine states, and maintenance parameters. These two approaches are combined to overcome the limitations of each individual method, with the machine learning model compensating for factors that physics-based models cannot capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite modeling approach by integrating multiple modeling paradigms. The hybrid model combines the deterministic nature of physics-based-simulation with the data-driven capabilities of machine learning, creating a composite system that leverages the strengths of both approaches to achieve higher reliability and accuracy in recipe optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If AI model is trained only on experimental data with limited exposure, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to low accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structureVSAvoidrecipe optimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using physics-based-simulation to generate synthetic data before training the machine learning model. This synthetic data is generated based on fundamental physics principles and covers a wide range of conditions that may not be available in experimental data. By preparing this additional training data in advance, the model achieves better accuracy without requiring complex architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of experimental data through physics-based-simulation. The simulation generates synthetic data that mirrors the structure and characteristics of experimental data but expands the training dataset to include scenarios that would be difficult or expensive to obtain experimentally. This copying approach allows the simple model to learn from a much broader range of conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If actual measured values are used instead of setpoint values, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates because deviations from setpoint are not captured in physics-based-simulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidprocess parameter optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using actual measured values from experiments to train and validate the machine learning model. The model learns the relationship between actual measured parameters (which include deviations from setpoints) and outcomes. This feedback loop allows the system to account for real-world variations and uncertainties, improving both reliability and manufacturing precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230316380A1System and method for recommending a recipe in a manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 TVARIT GMBH
  • US20230316380A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316380A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316380A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for recommending a recipe to produce a product in a manufacturing process is disclosed. The computer-implemented method includes steps of: obtaining experimental data from a machine; generating a physics-based-simulation model based on the experimental data obtained from the machine; generating synthetic data for a first plurality of recipes using the physics-based-simulation model; determining an optimized physical range from physical ranges of each parameter by analyzing the experimental data and the synthetic data using a trained AI model; generating a second plurality of recipes when the optimized physical range of each parameter creating the second plurality of recipes is valid; validating the second plurality of recipes to extract an optimized recipe using the physics-based-simulation model; and recommending the optimized recipe for producing the product in the machine.