Recipe Synchronization With Remote Appliance Temperature Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-function cooking apparatuses struggle to synchronize with remote kitchen appliances under changing operating conditions, leading to deviations in cooking results due to temperature and power discrepancies, which affect the reproducibility of food products.

Innovation Solution

A control system that synchronizes food processing steps between the cooking apparatus and remote kitchen appliances by communicating control parameters, monitoring actual conditions, and adjusting recipe program instructions to ensure compliance with predefined settings, using a communicative coupling via various protocols and sensors to maintain reproducibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a multi-function cooking apparatus operates with remote kitchen appliances using predefined recipe programs, then cooking results can be reproduced consistently, but the system cannot adapt when actual operating conditions (temperature, power) deviate from expected conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of cooking resultsVSAvoidadaptability to changing operating conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously receives actual operating condition data (temperature, power) from sensors during cooking operations and compares this feedback with the expected conditions defined in the recipe program. This enables the system to detect deviations and trigger appropriate responses to maintain reproducibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the recipe program execution based on real-time operating conditions. When deviations are detected, the control system modifies subsequent cooking steps adaptively, transforming a static predefined recipe into a dynamic process that responds to actual conditions while maintaining the desired cooking outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the control system monitors and adjusts for deviations in remote kitchen appliances, then reproducible cooking results are maintained, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of cooking resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a recipe program interface for accessing predefined cooking instructions, a control parameter interface for receiving actual operating conditions, a control parameter evaluator for comparing actual vs. expected conditions, and a recipe program adjustment component for modifying execution. This modular architecture manages complexity by dividing the control function into specialized, manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between the recipe program (predefined instructions) and the cooking apparatus (physical execution). It receives actual operating conditions as input, evaluates them against expected parameters, and adjusts the recipe program accordingly, mediating between the idealized recipe and the real-world variations in appliance performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the recipe program is adjusted in real-time based on actual operating conditions, then synchronization between cooking apparatus and remote appliances is maintained, but the processing time for evaluating and adjusting instructions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization of cooking stepsVSAvoidtime for evaluating and adjusting recipe program
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of actual operating conditions against expected parameters as data becomes available during cooking, rather than waiting until the end. The control parameter evaluator continuously compares sensor readings with recipe requirements and triggers adjustments proactively, preventing synchronization issues before they affect the cooking outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring and adjustment process operates continuously throughout the cooking operation rather than as discrete interrupts. The control system maintains continuous feedback loops between sensor input, evaluation, and recipe program adjustment, ensuring that synchronization is preserved without stopping or pausing the cooking process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3206095B1System and method for synchronizing food processing steps of a multi-function cooking apparatus with food processing steps of a remote kitchen appliance
Publication Date: 2018.06.27 VORWERK & CO INTERHOLDING GMBH
  • EP3206095B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3206095B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3206095B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A control system (100) for synchronizing food processing steps performed by a multi-function cooking apparatus (200) with food processing steps performed by one or more remote kitchen appliances (301, 302), includes a recipe program interface (120) configured to access a recipe program on a data storage device (400) wherein the recipe program is configured to be executed by the cooking apparatus (200) and has internal instructions configured to control functions (240) of the cooking apparatus (200) for performing food processing steps thereon, and has at least one external instruction for a remote food processing step performed by a particular remote kitchen appliance (301). It further has a control parameter interface (110) configured to receive, from a remote temperature sensor (310), temperature data reflecting one or more temperature values associated with a component of the food product being processed by the particular remote kitchen appliance (301) in response to the execution of the at least one external instruction. It further has a control parameter evaluator (130) configured to check compliance of the received temperature data with control parameters of the at least one external instruction. It further has a recipe program adjustment component (140) configured to adjust, if the received temperature data does not comply with the control parameters of the at least one external instruction, not-yet-executed program instructions of the recipe program based on the evaluation of the received temperature data to re-synchronize the cooking apparatus (200) with the particular remote kitchen appliance (301).