Recipient Validation Using Transaction Themes and Transfer Memos

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack confidence in validating intended recipients for electronic funds transfers, as available information is often insufficient to confirm the correctness of the selected recipient.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing natural language processing (NLP) and graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to dynamically rearrange the order of candidate recipients based on themes derived from past transactions and transfer memo information, ensuring the most likely intended recipient is at the top, and implementing security actions if similarity thresholds are not met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional recipient validation methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the accuracy of recipient validation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient validation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation system that acts as a mediator between the sender and recipient. This system analyzes transfer memos, compares them against historical transaction patterns, and validates recipient information before completing the transfer. The intermediary layer adds accuracy without requiring fundamental changes to the underlying transfer infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by analyzing historical transaction data and transfer memos to continuously improve validation accuracy. The system learns from past transactions, compares current transfer patterns against historical data, and adjusts validation decisions based on this feedback loop, thereby improving accuracy without linearly increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If detailed recipient information review is required, then validation accuracy improves, but the time required for validation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient confirmation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-analyzing and storing historical transaction patterns, recipient information, and transfer memos before actual transfers occur. When a transfer is initiated, the validation process compares current information against pre-processed historical data, significantly reducing the time required for real-time validation while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual review processes with automated natural language processing and machine learning algorithms. Instead of requiring users to manually review recipient details, the system automatically analyzes transfer memos, compares them against historical patterns, and validates recipients using computational methods, thereby reducing validation time while improving consistency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If available recipient information is limited, then the system is easier to operate, but the ability to confirm intended recipient is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem usabilityVSAvoidrecipient confirmation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system serves as an intermediary that enriches limited recipient information by comparing it against comprehensive historical transaction data. The system analyzes transfer memos, cross-references them with past transaction patterns, and uses this intermediary analysis to reliably confirm intended recipients even when initial information is minimal, thereby maintaining usability while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service validation by automatically gathering and analyzing additional information without requiring user input. The validation process autonomously retrieves historical transaction data, analyzes transfer memos, and confirms recipient identity, allowing the system to compensate for limited initial information while maintaining ease of operation for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260050902A1Systems and methods for validating intended recipients for electronic funds transfer
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20260050902A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050902A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050902A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments may include a method for validating intended recipients for electronic funds transfer by receiving recipient identification information from a user device, identifying a list of one or more candidate recipients based on the recipient identification information, and outputting the list of the one or more candidate recipients for display via a graphical user interface (GUI) of the user device. Next, for each candidate recipient of the one or more candidate recipients, the method can identify one or more themes associated with past transactions associated with the candidate recipient, and, responsive to dynamically receiving transfer memo information from the user device, dynamically adjust an order of the list of the one or more candidate recipients for display via the GUI of the user device based on comparing the one or more themes and the transfer memo information.