Reciprocal Connector Assembly for Stable Tool-Free Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing male and female fitting systems lack simultaneous presence of both connectors in each part, leading to unstable fixation, limited universality, and inefficient disconnection, particularly in objects that require frequent assembly and disassembly, and do not allow for standardized connections across different products.

Innovation Solution

A reciprocal fitting system with male and female connectors in each part, featuring complementary retainers, allowing for universal connection and stable fixation without the need for tools, using materials like metals, polymers, and rubberized materials, with geometric configurations ensuring easy assembly and disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional male and female fitting systems are used where each part has only one type of connector, then the structure is simple, but the fixation stability is poor and universality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation stabilityVSAvoidconnector structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines both male and female connectors into each individual part, creating a unified connector structure that integrates previously separate components. This merging allows each part to function as both male and female connector simultaneously, improving fixation stability through dual-connector engagement while maintaining structural efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each part is designed with both male and female connectors, enabling universal compatibility across all parts in the system. This multi-functionality allows any part to connect with any other part regardless of orientation or position, significantly enhancing system universality and adaptability without requiring different connector types for different components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If additional retainers are added to increase fixation, then connection strength improves, but disconnection becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoiddisconnection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is designed with elastic material and configurable geometry (such as spring-loaded or flexible arms) that allows it to dynamically adapt during connection and disconnection. During assembly, the retainer flexes to engage with the complementary part, providing strong fixation. During disassembly, the elastic properties enable the retainer to flex outward, allowing easy manual release without tools while maintaining strong connection during use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If connectors are made larger to ensure effective locking, then connection stability improves, but material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking effectivenessVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The connector utilizes composite construction combining rigid structural elements for locking engagement with elastic retainer components. This composite approach allows compact dimensions while maintaining locking effectiveness through the synergistic combination of rigid geometry and elastic retention forces, reducing overall material usage compared to purely rigid large connectors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes connector dimensions and retainer geometry parameters to achieve maximum locking effectiveness in minimal space. By carefully adjusting parameters such as retainer spring constant, engagement angle, and connector profile, the design achieves effective locking with compact size, minimizing material consumption while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If frequent assembly and disassembly is required, then adaptability improves, but connection stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly frequencyVSAvoidconnection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The elastic retainer is designed to automatically reset and re-engage after each connection cycle without manual intervention. The self-service mechanism maintains connection stability through repeated use, with the elastic material providing consistent retention force that adapts to wear and usage cycles, ensuring reliable fixation even after frequent assembly and disassembly operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12454976B2Reciprocal fitting system
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 EMILY TIEMY ITO ME
  • US12454976B2 patent drawing
  • US12454976B2 patent drawing
  • US12454976B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fitting system with at least two connecting pieces that fit together. The connecting pieces comprise a male connector and a female connector simultaneously in the same part, and have additional retainers. This fitting system can be coupled to various products such as storage recipients or packages in various areas (cosmetics, foodstuffs, pharmaceuticals, etc.).