Reciprocating Biomass Conversion Engine Quenches Secondary Pyrolysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biomass conversion reactors, such as fluidized-bed reactors, suffer from inefficiencies due to the need for external cooling, which leads to heat loss and reduced bio-oil quality due to secondary pyrolysis reactions.

Innovation Solution

A four-stroke internal combustion engine is repurposed for biomass conversion, where a mixture of pulverized biomass and non-oxidizing compression gas is pyrolyzed during the compression stroke, and the resulting bio-products are rapidly cooled during the expansion stroke to quench secondary reactions, improving thermal efficiency and bio-oil quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a fluidized-bed reactor is used for biomass pyrolysis, then the biomass can be converted to bio-oil, but external cooling is required which causes heat loss and reduces thermal efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal efficiencyVSAvoidheat loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the pyrolysis reactor and cooling condenser into a single integrated device. The reactor chamber serves dual purposes: as the reaction vessel for pyrolysis and as the cooling chamber where bio-products are condensed. This eliminates the need for separate external cooling systems, reducing heat loss and improving thermal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor design allows the reaction chamber to cool itself by serving as the condensation chamber. The walls of the reactor chamber directly contact the hot bio-products after pyrolysis, transferring heat to condense them without requiring external cooling media. This self-cooling mechanism eliminates the need for separate cooling systems and reduces energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If external cooling is applied to condense bio-products, then the condensation process can occur, but secondary pyrolysis reactions are triggered which degrade bio-oil quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebio-oil qualityVSAvoidsecondary pyrolysis reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention rapidly transitions the bio-products from the high-temperature pyrolysis zone to the cooling condensation zone within the same chamber. The quick movement and immediate cooling prevent the bio-products from remaining in the high-temperature environment long enough to undergo secondary pyrolysis reactions, thus preserving bio-oil quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Solution Approach 2:

By combining the pyrolysis and condensation functions in one chamber with controlled flow paths, the system achieves rapid cooling of bio-products immediately after pyrolysis. This integrated design ensures that condensation occurs before secondary reactions can take place, maintaining high bio-oil quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional reactor designs are used, then the conversion process can proceed, but the system requires complex external cooling components that increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor chamber is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as the pyrolysis reaction vessel, the cooling chamber, and the condensation chamber. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate external cooling systems, condensers, and associated piping, significantly reducing device complexity while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges previously separate components (reactor, cooler, condenser) into a single integrated chamber. This consolidation simplifies the overall system structure, reduces the number of parts that need to be manufactured and assembled, and eliminates complex external cooling infrastructure while maintaining all necessary functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If fast pyrolysis is performed at high temperatures, then bio-oil production efficiency increases, but more energy is required for heating and maintaining the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebio-oil production rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the waste heat from the pyrolysis process into a useful resource for driving the condensation process. The hot reactor chamber walls directly condense the bio-products, utilizing the thermal energy that would otherwise be lost. This transforms what would be wasted energy into a productive function, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining high bio-oil production rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor system self-regulates by using its own thermal energy to drive the condensation process. The heat generated during pyrolysis automatically serves to cool and condense the bio-products without requiring external energy input for cooling, creating a self-sustaining thermal cycle that improves energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy consumption, increases biomass throughput, and enhances bio-oil quality, resulting in lower operational costs and higher quality biofuel production compared to traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

compressing and heating the first mixture. The compression and heating of the first mixture pyrolizes the biomass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression heating: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The compression and heating of the first mixture pyrolizes the biomass to produce a second mixture including a bio-oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

during an expansion stroke of the at least one piston, decompressing and cooling the second mixture. The decompression and cooling of the second mixture quenches secondary pyrolysis of the bio-oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic cooling: Adiabatic Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS10329493B2Reciprocating biomass conversion scheme
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • US10329493B2 patent drawing
  • US10329493B2 patent drawing
  • US10329493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for converting a biomass to a bio-oil includes providing a four-stroke internal combustion engine having at least one cylinder, at least one piston, and a crankshaft coupled to each of the at least one piston. The method also includes coupling a power source to the crankshaft in a manner such that the power source drives rotation of the crankshaft. The method also includes injecting a first mixture including a biomass and a non-oxidizing compression gas into one of the cylinders. The method also includes compressing and heating the first mixture during a compression stroke of the pistons. The compression and heating of the first mixture pyrolizes the biomass to produce a second mixture including a bio-oil and the compression gas. The method also includes decompressing and cooling the second mixture during an expansion stroke of the pistons. The decompression and cooling of the second mixture quenches secondary pyrolysis.