Reciprocating Cutter Powder Production for Uniform AM Particles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current powder production methods for additive manufacturing yield powders with inconsistent particle size distributions and low uniformity, leading to inefficiencies in 3D printing processes, as only a small percentage of produced particles are suitable for additive manufacturing due to large or non-uniform sizes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system involving a reciprocating cutter to attrite an elongated workpiece, producing powders with at least 95% of particles having a diameter ranging from 10 μm to 200 μm, with controlled particle size and shape to improve flow characteristics and suitability for additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If atomization techniques are used to produce metal powder, then powder production volume is high, but particle size distribution is wide and uniformity is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowder production volumeVSAvoidparticle size distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental processing parameter from thermal atomization to mechanical attrition. The reciprocating cutter mechanically fractures the workpiece at controlled frequencies (e.g., 10-100 Hz) with specific amplitudes (e.g., 0.1-10 mm), producing particles with narrow size distribution (e.g., 15-45 μm) while maintaining high production rates. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by decoupling productivity from particle uniformity control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic reciprocating motion of the cutter rather than static or continuous rotation. The cutter accelerates and decelerates periodically, creating varying stress conditions that produce more uniform particle sizes. The dynamic control of contact time and force between cutter and workpiece enables precise particle size control while maintaining high production volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conventional atomization is used, then powder can be produced quickly, but only 20-40% of particles are suitable for additive manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowder production speedVSAvoidpercentage of unusable powder
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing from atomization parameters (gas pressure, melt flow rate) to mechanical attrition parameters (cutter frequency, amplitude, hardness), the process produces particles within the optimal size range for additive manufacturing (e.g., 15-45 μm) with high consistency. This results in 90-95% or more of produced powder being usable, dramatically reducing material loss while maintaining production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal-mechanical atomization system with a purely mechanical attrition system. The reciprocating cutter mechanically fractures the workpiece without melting or rapid cooling, directly producing particles of controlled size and shape that are immediately suitable for additive manufacturing applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If particle size is not controlled, then production process is simple, but flow characteristics and 3D printing efficiency are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction process simplicityVSAvoidpowder flow characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention controls particle size through mechanical parameters (cutter frequency, amplitude, hardness) rather than complex thermal processes. This produces particles with uniform size and spherical morphology that naturally exhibit excellent flow characteristics, improving 3D printing efficiency without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The reciprocating cutter action produces particles with more spherical shapes compared to the irregular shapes from atomization. The repeated impact and fracture cycles round the particles, improving their flow characteristics and packing behavior in the 3D printing process, while the process remains relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces powders with a narrow size distribution and uniform shape, enhancing the operating efficiency of 3D printing machines by increasing the percentage of usable particles, reducing porosity, and maintaining the phase composition of the source material, thus improving the flow rate and reducing the need for post-processing.

Implementation Method 1

mechanically attriting a source or feedstock with a reciprocating cutter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical attrition: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS20240367224A1System and Method for Powder Manufacturing
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 METAL POWDER WORKS LLC
  • US20240367224A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367224A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367224A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A powder production method includes providing an elongated workpiece and repeatedly contacting an outer surface of the elongated workpiece with a reciprocating cutter according to a predetermined at least one frequency to produce a powder. The powder includes a plurality of particles, wherein at least 95% of the produced particles have a diameter or maximum dimension ranging from about 10 μm to about 200 μm. A system for producing powders having a plurality of particles including a cutter and at least one controller is also provided herein.