Reciprocating Knife Drive Assembly for Agricultural Harvesters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural harvester vehicles with draper platforms face challenges in efficiently driving reciprocating knife assemblies for wider implements, as increased reciprocating mass leads to header shaking and requires additional gearboxes and drive shafts, which can block crop flow and increase weight.

Innovation Solution

A reciprocating knife drive assembly that uses bell cranks and flexible couplings within endless belt loops, with a single gearbox driving both bell cranks to reduce mass and avoid blocking crop flow, while being partially housed within the belt system to minimize space and weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single reciprocating gearbox is disposed at one end of the implement to drive a single reciprocating knife extending the entire width, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reciprocating mass increases causing header shaking and reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of gearboxes and drive shaftsVSAvoidheader stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single long reciprocating knife is divided into multiple shorter knife segments (first reciprocating knife and second reciprocating knife), each with its own drive mechanism. This segmentation reduces the reciprocating mass of each individual knife, thereby reducing header shaking and improving reliability while maintaining the ability to cut across the entire implement width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If gearboxes are disposed on opposite ends of the implement with drive shafts extending to the middle, then header stability is improved by reducing reciprocating mass, but the device complexity and weight increase due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader stabilityVSAvoidnumber of gearboxes and drive shafts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive mechanisms for the first and second reciprocating knives are merged into a single integrated reciprocating knife drive assembly located at one end of the implement. This assembly includes a single gearbox that drives both bell cranks, eliminating the need for separate gearboxes and long drive shafts extending to the middle of the implement, thus reducing complexity and weight while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Weight of stationary object

If the drive mechanism is disposed above the conveying mechanism to drive reciprocating knives, then the weight of the reciprocating knife arrangement is reduced, but crop flow is blocked onto the conveying mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive mechanism weightVSAvoidcrop flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The bell cranks are repositioned from a vertical arrangement above the conveying mechanism to a lateral arrangement where they extend sideways within the plane of the conveyors. This dimensional change allows the drive mechanism to operate without blocking the vertical crop flow path onto the conveying mechanism, maintaining productivity while keeping the weight reduction benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Weight of stationary object

If bell cranks are disposed within endless belt loops, then the drive mechanism takes up less space and weight is reduced, but the device complexity increases due to integration within conveyor system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive mechanism weightVSAvoidintegration within conveyor system
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bell cranks are nested within the loops of the endless belts of the lateral conveyors, utilizing the existing conveyor structure to house the drive mechanism components. This nesting arrangement reduces the overall space required for the drive mechanism and decreases weight, while the integration complexity is managed by utilizing the existing conveyor belt path as the structural framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS9622409B2Reciprocating knife assembly and reciprocating knife drive assembly
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 DEERE & CO
  • US9622409B2 patent drawing
  • US9622409B2 patent drawing
  • US9622409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reciprocating knife assembly of an agricultural implement includes first and second elongate reciprocating knives disposed along a leading edge of an agricultural implement, the reciprocating knives being disposed end to end and extending colinearly for simultaneous reciprocation in opposite directions, the first and second reciprocating knives being supported for sliding movement on the agricultural implement in a lateral direction generally perpendicular to the direction of travel of the agricultural implement as it travels through an agricultural field harvesting crop, a first bell crank coupled to the first reciprocating knife to reciprocate said knife, a second bell crank coupled to the second reciprocating knife to reciprocate the second reciprocating knife, and a common drive coupled to the first and second bell cranks to drive both the first and second bell cranks in opposite directions simultaneously.