Reciprocating Shuttle Sorter for Multi-Bin Dynamic Sortation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sortation systems are inefficient and costly due to their inflexibility, high mechanical complexity, and reliance on human labor, which limits throughput and requires a large number of collection bins, leading to increased space and capital costs.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic sortation system utilizing robotic manipulators and learning algorithms to efficiently assign objects to collection bins based on real-time data and historical trends, reducing the need for pre-defined bin assignments and allowing for flexible correspondence between sorter outputs and destinations, thereby optimizing space usage and reducing manual labor requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If discrete trays with actuators are used for each divert location, then objects can be automatically sorted to multiple destinations, but mechanical complexity and cost per divert increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of divert locationsVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple collection bins are merged into a single reciprocating carriage structure, allowing one carriage to serve multiple destinations sequentially. This eliminates the need for separate actuators at each divert location, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining adaptability to multiple destinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The carriage is made reciprocating (dynamic) rather than stationary, allowing it to move between different collection bin locations. This dynamic positioning enables a single carriage to access multiple destinations without requiring fixed actuators at each location, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If a large number of collection bins are deployed to handle diverse object types, then all objects can be sorted simultaneously, but physical space and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reciprocating carriage serves multiple collection bin locations sequentially, making a single carriage structure universal for multiple destinations. This reduces the total number of carriages needed while maintaining the ability to sort to many different destinations, thereby reducing physical space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of arranging collection bins in a single linear array requiring long conveyor tracks, the reciprocating carriage enables access to multiple bins through bidirectional movement, effectively utilizing space in a different dimensional configuration and reducing the footprint of the sortation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If human workers perform sortation manually, then flexibility in handling various object types is maintained, but throughput is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling objectsVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated scanning and identification to determine object destinations, with the reciprocating carriage automatically delivering objects to the correct bins. This self-service automation maintains flexibility through smart routing algorithms while dramatically increasing throughput beyond human capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual human sortation is replaced with an automated system combining optical scanning, computational routing, and mechanical reciprocating carriage movement. This substitution maintains the flexibility of human decision-making through software algorithms while achieving the speed and consistency of automated mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Extent of automation

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used, then automated sortation is achieved, but every divert requires an actuator increasing cost and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sortationVSAvoidactuator requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator mechanism is extracted from multiple fixed locations and consolidated into a single reciprocating carriage. This centralization eliminates the need for numerous distributed actuators, reducing complexity and cost while maintaining automated sortation capability across multiple destinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reciprocating carriage acts as an intermediary between the single actuator and multiple collection bins. Instead of requiring actuators at each bin location, the carriage mediates the delivery process by moving objects to the appropriate bins sequentially, reducing the total number of actuators needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves higher throughput, lower operational costs, and greater scalability by dynamically allocating sorter outputs to destinations, allowing for efficient handling of varying object sizes and weights, and reducing the need for extensive manual intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a reciprocating carriage (50) configured to reciprocate between a first end and a second end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical motion:

Implementation Method 2

the load bed (52) is tipped, causing the object (80) to be released into a collection bin (22, 24, 26, 28, 32, 34, 36 or 38)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3383773B1Systems and methods for dynamic sortation of objects with reciprocating carriages
Publication Date: 2024.01.24 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • EP3383773B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3383773B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3383773B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

An automated shuttle sorter is disclosed that includes a carriage that is movable from a load position at which the carriage may be loaded, and at least two destination locations into which any contents of the carriage may be provided from the carriage