Recoater Blade Force Monitoring for Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing apparatuses face challenges in ensuring uniform application of build material, leading to deviations and irregularities in the three-dimensional objects due to uneven layer formation, which can result in mechanical imperfections and damage to application elements.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus equipped with a determination unit to monitor forces acting on the application element during the application process, using force-sensitive elements and a control unit to adjust movement and process parameters, ensuring proper application and preventing contact with previously built layers or spatters, thereby maintaining process quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If build material is applied using a conventional application element without force monitoring, then the application process is simpler and faster, but the uniformity and quality of the build material layer deteriorates due to undetected contact irregularities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of build material layerVSAvoidcomplexity of application unit
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by equipping the application element with force-sensitive elements that continuously monitor contact forces during the application process. When deviations from expected force patterns are detected (indicating contact with previously built layers or spatters), the system generates signals that trigger corrective actions, such as adjusting the application element's position or pausing the process. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures layer uniformity while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the application element moves at high speed without force monitoring, then productivity increases, but the risk of contact damage to the application element or previously built layers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication speedVSAvoidrisk of contact damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by proactively monitoring contact forces before actual damage can occur. The force-sensitive elements detect potential contact issues (such as approaching previously built layers or spatters) before they result in damage. When abnormal force patterns are detected, the system preemptively adjusts the application element's movement or pauses the process, preventing damage while allowing high-speed operation to continue during normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If force monitoring and real-time adjustment systems are added to the application unit, then process quality and object quality improve, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of three-dimensional objectVSAvoidcomplexity of determination and control units
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback through force-sensitive elements integrated into the application element, which continuously monitor contact forces and provide real-time information to a determination unit. This feedback mechanism enables quality control without requiring complex external monitoring systems, as the sensing capability is built directly into the application element itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The application element performs self-diagnosis and self-correction by using its own force-sensitive elements to detect contact irregularities and triggering automatic adjustments through the control unit. This self-service capability reduces the need for external monitoring and intervention systems, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity while maintaining high quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If conventional application methods are used without contact detection, then the process is faster and simpler, but deviations in object geometry and mechanical behavior occur due to uneven layer application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of mechanical behaviorVSAvoidtime for force monitoring and adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by implementing force monitoring that operates continuously during the application process without interrupting the workflow. The force-sensitive elements provide real-time feedback, allowing the system to make minor adjustments on-the-fly rather than requiring stop-and-check procedures. This ensures consistent layer application and reliable mechanical behavior while minimizing time loss, as the monitoring and adjustment processes occur seamlessly during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus effectively determines and adjusts for irregularities in the application process, preventing damage and ensuring the quality of the three-dimensional objects by monitoring forces and adjusting parameters, thus improving the consistency and reliability of the additive manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

The determination unit (12) comprises a determination element (13) that is adapted to determine contact information relating to a force acting on the application element (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4059698B1Apparatus for additively manufacturing three-dimensional objects
Publication Date: 2024.12.04 CONCEPT LASER
  • EP4059698B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4059698B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

1. An apparatus (1) for additively manufacturing three-dimensional objects (2), the apparatus (1) comprising: an application unit (6) comprising a recoater blade (7) configured to apply build material (3) on a build plane (8); a determination unit (12) comprising a determination element (13) configured to determine contact information relating to a force acting on the recoater blade (7) during an application process, the force caused by a deviation in one or more previously consolidated layers (10) of build material (3) protruding from the build plane (8); and a control unit (14) configured to adjust one or more process parameters based at least in part on the contact information, wherein the one or more process parameters comprises an irradiation parameter.