Recognition Model Integration via Linear Summation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recognition models require extensive training time and resources when updating with large amounts of additional data, as they need to retrain from scratch, which is inefficient and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that integrates a first recognition model with a second model generated from additional training data using a linear summation approach, allowing for efficient updating of recognition models by selecting weights based on the quantity and importance of data, thereby reducing the need for extensive retraining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the model is trained with the sum of prior existing training data and additional training data, then the model can learn from all available data, but the training time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel learning completenessVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into two distinct phases: (1) initial model training using only basic training data, and (2) subsequent fine-tuning using only additional training data. This segmentation avoids the need to retrain on the complete dataset (basic + additional), thereby significantly reducing training time while maintaining model learning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training action by first training the model on basic training data to establish an initial recognition model. This preliminary model serves as a foundation that can be quickly adapted to additional data without requiring complete retraining, thus reducing overall training time while ensuring the model learns from all available data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the model is trained with large amounts of data, then the model performance improves, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into two efficient stages: initial training on basic data to establish performance foundation, and subsequent fine-tuning on additional data to improve performance further. This segmentation avoids the computationally expensive process of training from scratch on the complete large dataset, thereby reducing computational resource requirements while maintaining model performance improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes training parameters by using different learning rates or optimization settings for the two training stages. The initial training uses parameters optimized for learning from basic data, while the fine-tuning stage uses parameters optimized for adapting to additional data. This parameter adaptation allows the model to achieve performance improvement from large amounts of data with reduced computational overhead compared to uniform training approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the model is retrained from scratch with all training data, then the model can incorporate new data, but the process is inefficient and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel update capabilityVSAvoidmodel updating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary training action by first establishing a recognition model using basic training data. This pre-trained model serves as a starting point that can be efficiently updated with additional data through fine-tuning, rather than requiring complete retraining from scratch. This approach maintains model adaptability to new data while dramatically improving updating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes training parameters between the initial model creation and subsequent updates. By using different optimization parameters, learning rates, or training configurations for the initial training versus the update phase, the system achieves efficient model updates that maintain adaptability without the inefficiency of complete retraining, thereby improving productivity in model updating operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10475442B2Method and device for recognition and method and device for constructing recognition model
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10475442B2 patent drawing
  • US10475442B2 patent drawing
  • US10475442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a device for recognition, and a method and a device for constructing a recognition model are disclosed. A device for constructing a recognition model includes a training data inputter configured to receive additional training data, a model learner configured to train a first recognition model constructed based on basic training data to learn the additional training data, and a model constructor configured to construct a final recognition model by integrating the first recognition model with a second recognition model generated by the training of the first recognition model.