Real Time Recommendation Engine Profile Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recommendation systems in natural language processing are limited as they primarily focus on item relationships and merchant needs, failing to consider consumer interests, desires, and hobbies, leading to missed opportunities for users to engage in activities that match their tastes and interests, especially during vacations when time is scarce and information overload is prevalent.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing natural language processing to analyze user profiles and external data sources to provide personalized recommendations for activities, events, and locations, matching user interests and preferences, and proactively alerting users to suitable options through a computing system that integrates sentiment analysis and profile matching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If recommendation systems focus on item relationships and merchant needs, then recommendation coverage and merchant satisfaction are improved, but user relevance and consumer interest alignment deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation coverageVSAvoiduser interest alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the recommendation problem into multiple components: user profile analysis, activity profile analysis, reviewer profile analysis, and real-time event matching. Each component processes specific data types independently before integrating results, allowing the system to maintain comprehensive coverage while improving precision through specialized processing of user interests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary profiles (activity profiles, reviewer profiles) that mediate between user profiles and item recommendations. These intermediaries contain enriched information about activities and reviewers, enabling more precise matching with user interests while maintaining broad recommendation coverage through the profile matching mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If recommendation systems provide comprehensive activity options, then user choice and engagement opportunities are improved, but information overload and user decision time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity optionsVSAvoiddecision time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing user profiles, activity profiles, and reviewer profiles before recommendation time. This pre-computation of profile matches and preferences allows the system to quickly generate personalized recommendations during actual decision moments, reducing user decision time while maintaining comprehensive activity options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with recommended activities refine their profiles over time. This continuous feedback loop enables the system to learn user preferences and improve recommendation accuracy, helping users make faster, more informed decisions while still presenting diverse activity options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If recommendation systems analyze detailed user profiles and external data, then recommendation precision and personalization are improved, but system complexity and processing requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis task into separate processing modules: user profile processing, activity profile processing, reviewer profile processing, and match generation. Each module handles specific data types and processing logic independently, making the overall complex system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high recommendation precision through integrated profile analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11308540B2Real time recommendation engine
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11308540B2 patent drawing
  • US11308540B2 patent drawing
  • US11308540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing recommendations to at least one user is disclosed. A user profile for the user is obtained. Data is identified in the user indicative of interests of the users. This is stored in a profile store. Activity profiles and profiles of reviewers of the activity are created. A match between the author profiles, the user profiles and the activity profiles are identified. From these matches a list of activities is generated and presented to the user to select an activity to engage in.