Personalized Product Recommendation Engine for Third-Party Services

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in efficiently acquiring and comparing third-party products and services due to the lack of a centralized system that can analyze disparate information and provide personalized recommendations based on user preferences and geographical location, leading to tedious research and potential suboptimal service selections.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that ranks third-party products and services based on user profiles and geographical location, using a product-ranking engine, profile engine, location engine, filtering engine, and recommendation-ranking engine to provide personalized and dynamic rankings of products and services pertinent to user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users conduct extensive research to identify optimal products and services, then they can make more informed decisions, but the process becomes tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidresearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting service information, pre-ranking services based on multiple factors, and pre-generating personalized recommendations before users need them. When users access the system, the matching and ranking work has already been done, dramatically reducing their research time while maintaining decision accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between service providers and users, automatically collecting service information from multiple providers, ranking them based on comprehensive factors, and presenting personalized recommendations. This intermediary function eliminates the need for users to manually research and compare services across multiple providers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If users contact multiple service providers individually to compare services, then they can find the most suitable option, but the process involves numerous phone calls and lengthy interviews

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice selection qualityVSAvoidacquisition process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple service provider interfaces and information sources into a single unified platform. It consolidates service listings, comparisons, and recommendations in one location, allowing users to evaluate multiple providers simultaneously without making numerous separate contact attempts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal functionality by serving as a single platform that performs information collection, service comparison, personalized ranking, and recommendation generation. This multi-functional system replaces the need for users to perform multiple separate tasks of contacting different providers individually

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a centralized system collects and analyzes disparate information from multiple sources, then it can provide personalized recommendations, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex information processing task into distinct functional modules: an information collection module that gathers data from multiple sources, a ranking module that scores services based on weighted factors, and a recommendation module that generates personalized results. This segmentation manages complexity by organizing functions into separate, manageable components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8346624B2Systems and methods for recommending third party products and services
Publication Date: 2013.01.01 ALLCONNECT
  • US8346624B2 patent drawing
  • US8346624B2 patent drawing
  • US8346624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for recommending third party products and services. The method includes the steps of ranking the third party products and services based on one or more factors, and generating a user profile based on one or more user-related factors. Next, the method determined appropriate third party products and services based on the user's geographical location and filters the third party products and services based on the user profile and the user's geographical location. These filtered results are dynamically ranked based on the user profile, and personalization of the third party products and services. Finally, the method provides the ranked results pertinent to the end user's preferences, and the geographical location.