Recommendation Ranking via User Interaction Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Building management systems (BMS) generate numerous recommendations that are difficult for operators to prioritize effectively due to overwhelming quantities, making it challenging to determine which recommendations should be addressed first.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for ranking recommendations based on context data, including user interest, current space utilization, environmental preferences, and organizational grouping, to calculate a score that determines the priority and display of recommendations, ensuring that the most impactful ones are emphasized.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a BMS generates numerous recommendations to improve building operations, then the comprehensiveness of recommendations is improved, but the difficulty of prioritizing and managing them increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of recommendationsVSAvoidease of prioritizing recommendations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large set of recommendations by calculating priority scores for each individual recommendation based on multiple factors (energy impact, cost, implementation complexity, etc.). This divides the overwhelming list into manageable, ranked segments that operators can address systematically, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive coverage and ease of prioritization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces new parameters (priority scores derived from energy impact, cost, complexity, and other factors) to transform the recommendation management approach. By changing from a simple list to a scored ranking system, operators can easily identify and prioritize high-impact recommendations without being overwhelmed by the total number of suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a BMS provides detailed context data for each recommendation, then the quality of decision-making is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of decision-makingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant context data needed for priority calculation (energy impact, cost, complexity metrics) from the vast amount of building operation data. This selective extraction provides sufficient decision-making quality without requiring the system to process and display all available data, thus managing complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces priority scores as an intermediary metric that synthesizes multiple complex factors (energy consumption, cost implications, implementation complexity) into a single manageable value. This intermediary simplifies the decision-making process by translating complex multi-dimensional data into an easily interpretable ranking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240232210A9Systems and methods for ranking recommendations
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US20240232210A9 patent drawing
  • US20240232210A9 patent drawing
  • US20240232210A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of ranking recommendations includes receiving a recommendation to improve asset utilization of at least one asset, detecting, via one or more user interfaces, user interaction with one or more other recommendations related to the recommendation, the user interaction indicating user interest in the one or more other recommendations related to the recommendation, calculating a score for the recommendation based on the user interest in the one or more other recommendations related to the recommendation, and performing an action that affects a utilization of the at least one asset based on at least one of the score or the recommendation.