Reconfigurable Battery Module Architecture for Heterogeneous Cell Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current battery energy storage systems (BESS) and reconfigurable BESS architectures face challenges in safely managing non-homogeneous second life power storage systems, where batteries from different manufacturers or with varying usage histories are integrated, leading to performance limitations and reduced system capabilities due to differences in storage capacity, charge/discharge rates, and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A modular and reconfigurable battery energy storage system (RBESS) architecture that includes power storage modules with individual power converters and switching circuits, allowing for parallel or series connections and bypassing of faulty modules, along with a power management system that optimizes power configuration based on real-time conditions like temperature and state of charge to balance load and ensure safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional hardwired BESS with fixed cell configuration is used, then system structure is simple, but the system is vulnerable to single cell failure and cannot extend useful life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system is divided into modular units, each with its own power electronics and control systems. This segmentation allows individual modules to be isolated or reconfigured without affecting the entire system, enabling fault tolerance while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized module designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic reconfiguration capabilities through power electronics switches that can change connection topologies in real-time. This allows the system to adapt its structure based on operational conditions and fault states, transforming a static vulnerable system into a dynamic resilient one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Duration of action of stationary object

If RBESS with reconfigurable architecture is used, then useful life of cells is extended, but storage/output capacity is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuseful life of battery systemVSAvoidstorage and output capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters such as voltage, current, and connection topology based on the state of individual cells. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the system can accommodate degraded cells and extend overall system life while minimizing the impact on total capacity through optimized power distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If non-homogeneous second life batteries are integrated, then system cost is reduced, but system is constrained by lowest performance devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidsystem power output capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality control by managing each battery module according to its specific characteristics rather than treating all modules uniformly. Power electronics and control systems adjust operational parameters for each module based on its individual performance capabilities, allowing heterogeneous modules to work together at optimal levels without being limited by the weakest component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The power electronics platform provides universal interfaces and control mechanisms that can accommodate different battery types, chemistries, and performance levels. This multi-functionality allows the system to integrate second-life batteries from various sources while maintaining overall system performance through adaptive management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If non-homogeneous second life batteries are integrated, then system versatility is improved, but safety risks increase due to different performance capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms through sensors and control systems that continuously monitor the state of each battery module. This real-time feedback allows the control system to detect and respond to safety concerns in heterogeneous modules, adjusting operational parameters or isolating problematic modules to prevent safety incidents while maintaining system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240413647A1A modular and reconfigurable battery energy storage system (RBESS)
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
  • US20240413647A1 patent drawing
  • US20240413647A1 patent drawing
  • US20240413647A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide modular and reconfigurable battery energy storage systems (RBESSs) exhibiting improved performance and power management capabilities. A power management system is provided to determine a power configuration for a plurality of power storage modules, each having a power storage device (e.g., a battery). The optimized power configuration balances a power load across active power storage modules (e.g., power storage devices being charged or discharged). The power management system is configured to control each power storage module/device on an individual basis, thereby enabling a greater degree of control and flexibility to achieve optimal balancing across a plurality of separate power storage devices within a power system (e.g., a battery pack).