Reconfigurable Interface Assembly for Adaptable Work-Piece Manipulation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional manufacturing systems require multiple work-piece processors and end effectors to accommodate different components, leading to space constraints and increased weight due to large servo motors needed for reconfiguration, limiting the ability to process multiple types of components at a single work station.
Innovation Solution
A reconfigurable interface assembly that includes sub-assemblies with brakes and motors to allow for linear, rotational, or three-dimensional movement of work-piece manipulators, enabling them to adapt to different work-piece configurations without the need for multiple processors or end effectors, by positioning the assembly between a work-piece supporter and manipulator.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If multiple work-piece processors and end effectors are used to accommodate different components, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and floor space requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The end effector is designed with a reconfigurable interface assembly that allows a single device to accommodate multiple work-piece configurations through adjustable sub-assemblies. The first sub-assembly attaches to the work-piece supporter and the second sub-assembly attaches to the work-piece manipulator, creating a universal interface that adapts to different components without requiring multiple specialized end effectors.
Solution Approach 2:
The interface assembly incorporates motors and brakes that enable dynamic reconfiguration of the sub-assemblies. The motors allow the sub-assemblies to move between different positions and orientations, while the brakes maintain stable positioning during work-piece processing. This dynamic capability enables a single end effector to handle multiple work-piece types sequentially.
2Adaptability or versatility
If large servo motors are used for reconfiguration, then adaptability is improved, but weight increases
Solution Approach 1:
The reconfiguration system is divided into separate sub-assemblies: a first sub-assembly attached to the work-piece supporter and a second sub-assembly attached to the work-piece manipulator. This segmentation allows the use of smaller, lighter motors in each sub-assembly compared to a single large servo motor, while maintaining full reconfiguration capability through coordinated movement of both sub-assemblies.
Solution Approach 2:
The interface assembly acts as an intermediary between the work-piece supporter and the work-piece manipulator. It includes motors and brakes that enable controlled movement and stable positioning of the sub-assemblies. This intermediary mechanism provides precise reconfiguration capability with reduced weight compared to direct servo motor attachment.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple tables are used to support different end effectors, then adaptability is improved, but floor space requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The interface assembly enables a single table to support multiple end effector configurations through its reconfigurable sub-assemblies. The first sub-assembly attaches to the table and the second sub-assembly attaches to the work-piece manipulator, allowing the same table to accommodate different work-piece types by reconfiguring the interface assembly rather than requiring separate tables for each end effector.
Solution Approach 2:
The functionality of multiple tables and multiple end effectors is merged into a single table with a reconfigurable interface assembly. The interface assembly combines the adaptation capabilities that would otherwise require multiple separate systems, consolidating them into one multi-functional unit that reduces floor space requirements.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables efficient processing of multiple types of components at a single work station, reducing the need for multiple machines and conserving floor space while minimizing the weight and complexity of reconfiguration systems.
Implementation Method 1
a first brake configured to inhibit movement of the second sub-assembly in the first direction with respect to the first sub-assembly
Implementation Method 2
a second brake configured to inhibit movement of the first sub-assembly in the second direction with respect to the first sub-assembly
Data Source
AI summary
An adaptable assembly line work-piece processor for use at a work station includes, but is not limited to, a work-piece supporter. The adaptable assembly line work-piece processor further includes, but is not limited to, a reconfigurable interface assembly attached to the work-piece supporter. The adaptable assembly line work-piece processor still further includes, but is not limited to, a work-piece manipulator attached to the reconfigurable interface assembly. The work-piece supporter, the reconfigurable interface assembly, and the work-piece manipulator are configured to cooperate to sequentially support and manipulate a plurality of differently configured work-pieces.