Reconfigurable Passive Mixer Cores for Linearity-Power Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional passive mixers in wireless receivers have a fixed conversion gain and linearity, leading to unnecessary high power consumption as they are designed to satisfy worst-case performance requirements across multiple communication standards, while active mixers suffer from higher distortion, noise figure, and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A configurable passive mixer with a controller and multiple passive mixer cores connected in parallel, where the controller varies the effective transistor size based on changing performance requirements by selectively enabling or disabling mixer cores and adjusting transistor widths, allowing for optimized performance across different communication standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a passive mixer is designed with fixed conversion gain for worst case receiver configuration, then linearity performance is improved, but power consumption increases unnecessarily for all receiver configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelinearity performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the mixer configuration changeable over time through a controller that selectively enables or disables mixer cores based on operating conditions. The effective transistor width is dynamically adjusted by controlling which mixer cores are active, allowing the system to adapt between worst-case and non-worst-case configurations, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining linearity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the effective transistor width parameter by selectively enabling or disabling mixer cores. This parameter change allows the mixer to provide higher conversion gain and better linearity when configured with more active cores for worst-case scenarios, or reduce power consumption by deactivating cores when worst-case conditions do not exist, thus resolving the contradiction between linearity performance and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple passive mixer cores are used to meet worst case performance requirements, then conversion gain and linearity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion gainVSAvoidmixer configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mixer into multiple independent mixer cores that can be selectively enabled or disabled. Each mixer core functions as an independent unit with its own transistors and connections. By segmenting the mixer this way, the system can meet worst-case performance requirements when needed by activating all cores, while reducing complexity and power consumption by activating only necessary cores during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal mixer structure where multiple mixer cores share common input and output connections. This multi-functional design allows the same physical hardware to provide different levels of performance depending on which cores are active. The controller selectively configures the mixer cores to provide appropriate conversion gain and linearity for different operating conditions, reducing the need for multiple dedicated mixer circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If passive mixer is designed for fixed configuration, then manufacturing precision is simplified, but adaptability to different communication standards deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixed configurationVSAvoidcommunication standard compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing a reconfigurable mixer where the controller can selectively enable or disable mixer cores based on the required communication standard. This dynamic configuration capability allows the same hardware to adapt to different standards (e.g., TDD, FDD) with varying performance requirements without requiring multiple dedicated mixer designs, thus maintaining ease of manufacture while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11418149B2Re-configurable passive mixer for wireless receivers
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11418149B2 patent drawing
  • US11418149B2 patent drawing
  • US11418149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A configurable passive mixer is described herein. According to one exemplary embodiment, a passive mixer for a wireless receiver comprises a plurality of passive mixer cores coupled in parallel with each mixer core configured to receive a same set of radio frequency input signals and a separately driven set of local oscillator input signals. Further, each mixer core is configured to be separately enabled or disabled so that the passive mixer can be selectively configured during operation to convert the same set of radio frequency input signals to a set of downconverted output signals that satisfy a certain performance requirement or performance parameter of the passive mixer.