System and method for configuration of buildings or storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing modular building systems lack the ability to efficiently reconfigure and transport rooms or entire properties to different locations, and they do not optimize storage density within buildings.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable modular building system using standardized containers with a framework structure and robotic load handling devices that allow for the movement and rearrangement of containers with different functions, enabling easy transportation and increased storage density by removing access points and corridors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If modular buildings use identical rooms manufactured in modules and assembled on site, then fast assembly and construction are achieved, but the buildings lack reconfigurability and adaptability to different functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into standardized container modules that can be independently manufactured and assembled. Each container serves as a discrete functional unit that can be stacked and reconfigured, enabling both rapid assembly and future adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates movable and reconfigurable elements within containers, such as adjustable interior structures and movable partitions, allowing the functional layout to change dynamically while maintaining the overall modular framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If corridors and access points are included in modular buildings, then ease of access and operation are improved, but storage density and space utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidstorage density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from horizontal circulation through corridors to vertical access through stacked container arrangements. Elevators and vertical transport mechanisms enable movement between levels, eliminating the need for horizontal corridors and maximizing storage density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Containers are stacked vertically one upon another, creating a nested arrangement where each container is positioned within the vertical envelope of the structure. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization while maintaining accessibility through vertical transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Quantity of substance

If containers are arranged in stacks within a framework structure, then storage density and space utilization are improved, but the complexity of the support structure and load handling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidframework structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework structure serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for stacked containers, enables vertical stacking arrangements, and integrates with load handling devices for container movement. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-latching and self-aligning mechanisms in the container stacking arrangement, where containers automatically secure to the framework and to each other, reducing the need for complex manual assembly and support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If load handling devices with independently moveable wheels are used on grid rails, then ease of moving containers to different locations is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer mobilityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The load handling device uses standardized wheel modules and rail components that can be replicated and assembled from simple, mass-producible parts. The independently moveable wheel assemblies are designed as interchangeable units, simplifying manufacturing and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10538388B2System and method for configuration of buildings or storage
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 OCADO INNOVATION LTD
  • US10538388B2 patent drawing
  • US10538388B2 patent drawing
  • US10538388B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular building system or storage system is disclosed with a number of stacks of containers as shown in FIG. 2, the stacks being positioned within a frame structure having uprights and a horizontal grid disposed above the stacks, the grid having substantially perpendicular rails on which load handling devices can run. Containers having functions associated with a number of residential or commercial uses are moved in to and out of the stacks by the robotic handling devices running on the grid. The containers disposed in the stacks are selected by function on demand by a user. In this way the building is reconfigurable to take in to account required uses.