Reconfigurable Automation Runtime With Reusable Function Stitching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automation runtime systems are monolithic and inflexible, requiring extensive re-engineering or redevelopment to adapt to new requirements, leading to long development cycles and high costs, with existing approaches like Brownfield and Greenfield development failing to facilitate easy modifications.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable runtime system using reusable runtime functions (RRFs) is constructed through a configuration programming language, allowing adaptation via specialization, stitching, and stacking operations, enabling seamless integration and modification without downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a monolithic runtime system is used, then system stability and reliability are improved, but adaptability to new requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to new requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The runtime system is divided into modular runtime functions (RRFs) that can be independently selected, configured, and combined. Each RRF represents a discrete functional unit that can be stitched together to form the complete runtime system, enabling both stability through proven modules and adaptability through flexible composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static monolithic structure to a dynamic configurable architecture where the runtime behavior can be changed by reconfiguring which RRFs are active and how they are connected. This allows the system to adapt to new requirements without rewriting the entire runtime program.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the runtime system is configured for real-time operation, then timing precision is improved, but flexibility to change operational modes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming precisionVSAvoidflexibility to change operational modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The runtime system allows dynamic switching between real-time and non-real-time operational modes by reconfiguring the selected RRFs and their connections. The same hardware platform can support different timing requirements by changing the software configuration rather than requiring dedicated hardware for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If Brownfield development is used to modify existing runtime systems, then development costs are reduced, but development time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment costVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the runtime system into reusable RRFs, developers can modify only the specific modules needed for new requirements rather than re-engineering the entire system. This reduces both the scope of work required (time) and leverages existing proven modules (cost).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows selective replacement of individual RRFs while retaining and reusing the majority of existing runtime functions. This enables incremental updates where only necessary components are changed, minimizing development effort and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Adaptability or versatility

If Greenfield development is used to create new runtime systems, then system customization is improved, but development effort and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem customizationVSAvoiddevelopment effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The runtime system is composed of pre-built, proven RRFs that can be selected and combined to create customized solutions. This approach provides the customization benefits of Greenfield development while reducing the development effort by reusing existing functional modules rather than building everything from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The RRFs are designed to be universal building blocks that can be applied across different runtime configurations and application domains. This universality reduces development effort by allowing the same core functions to be reused in multiple contexts while still enabling extensive customization through different combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12461720B2System and method for adapting a reconfigurable runtime system used in automation systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SIEMENS AG
  • US12461720B2 patent drawing
  • US12461720B2 patent drawing
  • US12461720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for constructing a reconfigurable runtime system used in an automation system using reusable runtime functions (RRFs) is disclosed. A specialization module executes a specialization operation to configure or customize at least one RRF to satisfy functional requirements of the automation system. A stitching module executes a stitching operation that connects output of at least one RRF to input of one or more other RRFs. A stacking module executes a stacking operation that stacks RRFs as layers to create new abstractions, functionality and services. The specialization operation, the stitching operation, and the stacking operation are performed according to a runtime specification language.