Reconfigurable Surface Priority Management for Wireless Conflicts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in managing conflicting configurations for reconfigurable surfaces, leading to disruptions and reduced quality of service due to incompatible reflection coefficients from multiple devices, which can result in packet failures and decreased network throughput.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for transmitting messages indicating reflection coefficients and priority levels to a reconfigurable surface, allowing it to prioritize and apply the coefficients for the highest priority communications, thereby resolving conflicts and improving communication quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple devices transmit reflection coefficients to the reconfigurable surface simultaneously, then the surface can support multiple communications, but conflicting configurations cause disruptions and reduce quality of service

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple communicationsVSAvoidquality of service
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Devices transmit priority levels along with reflection coefficient configurations to the reconfigurable surface in advance. This preliminary information allows the surface to preemptively resolve conflicts by applying configurations in priority order, preventing disruptions before they occur and maintaining quality of service while supporting multiple communications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reconfigurable surface dynamically changes its reflection coefficients based on priority levels received from multiple devices. By adjusting the reflection parameters according to communication priority, the surface ensures that high-priority communications receive optimal configurations while lower-priority ones are deferred, resolving conflicts without reducing overall system versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the reconfigurable surface applies reflection coefficients for one device, then that communication quality improves, but conflicting coefficients from other devices cause packet failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidpacket failures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Priority levels are transmitted in advance with each configuration request, enabling the reconfigurable surface to establish a predetermined application order. This preliminary prioritization ensures that when multiple devices compete for the surface, the system can apply configurations sequentially by priority, improving selected communication quality while preventing packet failures from conflicting simultaneous applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The priority level mechanism acts as an intermediary that mediates between multiple devices competing for the reconfigurable surface. By introducing this intermediate prioritization layer, the surface can resolve conflicts fairly and systematically, ensuring that high-priority communications receive the necessary reflection coefficients without causing harmful packet failures to other communications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the surface configures reflection coefficients for high-priority communications, then quality of service improves, but system complexity increases due to conflict management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of serviceVSAvoidconflict management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reconfigurable surface manages complexity by changing only the necessary reflection coefficient parameters based on received priority levels. Rather than implementing complex conflict resolution protocols, the system simply adjusts reflection parameters according to priority, maintaining improved quality of service while minimizing the increase in system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prioritizes communication services, reducing disruptions and improving network throughput by ensuring that high-priority communications receive optimal reflection coefficients, thus enhancing the overall quality of service and reducing packet failures.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting, to a surface that is reflective of radio frequency signals, a message indicating a set of reflection coefficients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20240187042A1Managing conflicting configurations for configuring a reflective surface
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240187042A1 patent drawing
  • US20240187042A1 patent drawing
  • US20240187042A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A surface used to reflect radio frequency signals may receive requests from multiple devices to configure a set of reflection coefficients. Each request may include a set of reflection coefficients and an indication of a priority level of communications associated with the set of reflection coefficients. A set of reflection coefficients included in a message transmitted from a device may be based on a position of another device relative to the device and the surface. The surface may configure a set of reflection coefficients based on the priority levels associated with the sets of reflection coefficients received in the requests.