Reconfigurable Table Frame Assembly for Stable Modular Workstations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing benching systems face issues with wobbly construction, high complexity leading to increased costs and difficulty in assembly, limited reconfigurability, and inability to adapt to changing workspace needs, such as converting workstations to seating areas.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable benching system with a simplified core frame structure and minimal components that can be easily assembled and disassembled using few tools, allowing for various configurations by sliding and mounting components like leg members, channel members, and table top assemblies, enabling flexible workstation arrangements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If benching systems are designed with minimal component parts to be easy to assemble without tools, then ease of assembly is improved, but the resulting assemblies become wobbly and lack quality look and feel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the benching structure into modular components (top members, leg structures, wire management components, storage components) that can be independently assembled and configured. Each component is designed with standardized connection features that simplify assembly while maintaining structural integrity when combined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional components are integrated into unified assemblies. For example, wire management components are combined with top members, and storage components are integrated with leg structures. This merging reduces the total number of separate parts while enhancing overall stability and functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If benching systems include a large number of components and mechanical linkages to provide high quality look and feel, then reliability is improved, but expense and assembly complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality look and feelVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Components are designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously. For example, top members provide both structural support and wire management capabilities, while leg structures offer both support and storage functionality. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, simplifying the overall system while maintaining quality appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs adjustable parameters such as reconfigurable connection points and variable positioning features that allow the same component to adapt to different configuration requirements. This flexibility eliminates the need for multiple specialized components for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If benching systems are designed with fixed configurations to ensure structural stability, then reliability is improved, but reconfigurability for different workspace needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates dynamic, reconfigurable connections between components. Connection points can be repositioned, and components can be reconfigured to create different workstation arrangements. This dynamic capability allows the structure to adapt to changing workspace requirements while maintaining stability through proper connection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The modular component design enables easy reconfiguration by allowing individual components to be separated, repositioned, and reassembled in different configurations. Each segment maintains its structural integrity while enabling flexibility in overall system arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If benching systems use simple assembly mechanisms to reduce cost and complexity, then ease of manufacture is improved, but the systems cannot be easily disassembled and reconfigured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connection mechanisms are designed to be both simple to assemble and easily reversible for reconfiguration. Features such as tool-free connection points, snap-fit mechanisms, and standardized mounting interfaces allow for simple initial assembly while enabling straightforward disassembly and reconfiguration when workspace needs change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8534752B2Reconfigurable table assemblies
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 STEELCASE INC
  • US8534752B2 patent drawing
  • US8534752B2 patent drawing
  • US8534752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hood assembly for use with furniture, the hood assembly comprising a frame structure including at least first and second rigid elongated frame members that are spaced apart by at least a first brace member and a fabric sock cover member that forms a passage that is open on at least one end, wherein the frame structure is slid into the passage to stretch the sock cover member over the frame structure and form an architectural structure including portions of the fabric sock cover member on either side of the frame member.