Reconfigurable Wall System with Zipper Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wall systems lack flexibility, requiring significant labor to reconfigure or move, and fail to adapt to changing needs, such as altering height or using different panel types, while also not providing an integrated look with existing walls or adequate design flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable wall system comprising modules with a frame and tile clip system, allowing for easy adjustment of height and panel substitution, with a zipper interface for connecting modules and a spline for extending or combining frames, along with levelers for secure mounting and a cantilever channel for accessories, enabling seamless integration with furniture systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional wall systems are used, then structural stability is maintained, but reconfiguration requires significant labor and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration easeVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system is divided into modular sections with standardized connection interfaces. Each module can be independently assembled, disassembled, and reconfigured without affecting the entire wall structure, enabling quick changes with minimal labor and time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wall system incorporates movable and adjustable components that allow dynamic reconfiguration. Modules can be easily moved, height can be adjusted, and the wall can be repositioned along floor tracks, transforming a static structure into a dynamic, adaptable system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed-height walls are used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing needs is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight adjustment capabilityVSAvoidwall structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system incorporates adjustable height mechanisms that allow the wall to be raised or lowered as needed. This dynamic capability enables the same wall structure to adapt to different spatial requirements without requiring multiple fixed-height wall systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The wall modules are designed with universal connection interfaces and standardized components that serve multiple functions. The same basic module structure supports height adjustment, repositioning, and various configuration options, reducing overall system complexity through standardization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If permanent walls are used, then aesthetic consistency is maintained, but design flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidaesthetic consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system uses modular sections with standardized connection details that maintain visual consistency. The segmented design allows different module types to be combined while preserving aesthetic uniformity through consistent joint design and surface alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wall system allows different aesthetic treatments on different modules or faces of the same module. This enables local customization of appearance while maintaining overall system consistency, providing design flexibility without sacrificing aesthetic coherence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If modular wall systems are used, then reconfiguration flexibility is improved, but integration with existing structures is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system incorporates transition components and adapter interfaces that mediate between the modular wall sections and existing permanent structures. These intermediary elements enable seamless integration with floors, ceilings, and existing walls while maintaining the modular system's reconfiguration capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The wall modules are designed with universal mounting capabilities that work with various floor types and ceiling structures. Standardized connection interfaces and adjustable mounting options allow the same module to integrate with different existing structures without requiring custom integration solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUSRE47693E1Integrated reconfigurable wall system
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 DIRTT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
  • USRE47693E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47693E1 patent drawing
  • USRE47693E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A movable reconfigurable wall system having at least one module having a front and rear surface, the at least one module having: vertical end frames disposed at least at its side edges, each the vertical end frame having a vertically extending flange directed toward the front surface and a vertically extending flange directed toward the rear surface; a plurality of horizontal stringers affixed between the pair of vertical end frames; and an aesthetic surface affixed to the stringers; and a removable connecting strip, the connecting strip adapted to affix about one of the two flanges on one of the vertical end frames and join the one of the two flanges to a corresponding flange on one of a second module, a wall bracket, a finishing trim or a connection post.