Reconstructed Bacon Analogue Using Segmented Meat Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pork-belly bacon is expensive due to the limited pork portion it is cut from, and alternative cuts like side-cut or back-cut bacon lack the flavor and texture of traditional pork-belly bacon, making an economical alternative desirable.

Innovation Solution

A pork-belly bacon analogue is created by combining a first component with 42% lean pork muscle and 58% fat with a second component of at least 85% lean ham trim, maintaining a marbled structure similar to traditional pork-belly bacon without using alginate binders or emulsified meat, relying on natural protein connections for cohesion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pork-belly bacon is used to maintain flavor and texture, then product quality is improved, but cost increases due to limited pork portion availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflavor and texture qualityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pork-belly bacon is segmented into distinct fat and lean components, which are then recombined in a controlled manner to recreate the marbled structure. This allows selective use of fat and lean portions from different pork cuts to achieve the desired texture and flavor profile while reducing dependence on limited pork-belly availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite meat product by combining fat and lean components in specific ratios (e.g., 42% lean pork muscle and 58% fat in the first component, 85% lean ham trim in the second component). This composite structure reproduces the characteristic marbled appearance and culinary properties of traditional pork-belly bacon while utilizing more economically available pork portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If alternative pork cuts are used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but flavor and texture quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidflavor and texture quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the reconstructed bacon are given different compositions to match the local quality characteristics of traditional pork-belly bacon. The fat component provides richness and flavor, while the lean component (particularly the 85% lean ham trim) contributes texture and structure. This localized quality control throughout the product ensures consistent flavor and texture similar to natural pork-belly bacon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If alginate binders or emulsified meat are used to improve product cohesion, then manufacturing ease is improved, but product naturalness and texture quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct cohesionVSAvoidtexture quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fat and lean components are formulated with inherent binding properties that allow them to hold together without external binders. The specific composition ratios and processing methods enable the components to self-bind through natural protein-fat interactions, eliminating the need for alginate or other additive binders while maintaining product cohesion and natural texture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The pork-belly bacon analogue offers an economical alternative with a texture and flavor similar to traditional pork-belly bacon, retaining slice integrity and fat profile without excessive rendering or fat separation, achieved through natural protein binding and thermal processing.

Implementation Method 1

the proteins within the meat are sufficient to retain the configuration of the combined components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtein extraction:

Implementation Method 2

achieved through natural protein binding and thermal processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal processing: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS11304426B2Bacon products and methods of making same
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC
  • US11304426B2 patent drawing
  • US11304426B2 patent drawing
  • US11304426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bacon analogue or a reconstructed bacon product having a first component with about 42% lean meat, such as a lean pork muscle and about 58% fat and a second component with at least about 85% lean meat, such as a lean pork muscle is provided. The bacon analogue may have a ratio of first to second components of between about 35:65 to about 65:35 and a total fat percentage of about 28% to about 48%. In another configuration, the ratio of first to second components is about 25:75 to about 75:25. In one approach, the bacon analogue is free from alginate binders and free of emulsified meat. In one configuration, the first and the second components are ground to a size of about 0.125-inch to 0.5-inch. After the first and second components are separately mixed and cured, the components are pumped together into a marbled slab having an appearance similar to a pork-belly, which may then be sliced.