Recording Apparatus Priority-Based Storage Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recording devices face storage capacity limitations, leading to failures in recording data due to insufficient free space, and require multiple hard disks for double recording, resulting in high costs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A recording apparatus that utilizes additional information to prioritize and manage data storage, allowing for deletion, compression, or relocation of data based on priority, ensuring consistent free space without relying on the order of recording, and switches or moves data between storage mediums as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If data is recorded continuously into storage medium until full, then storage capacity is fully utilized, but recording of new data fails when free space is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacity utilizationVSAvoidrecording reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring free space and proactively deleting low-priority data before the storage medium becomes full. This prevents recording failures by ensuring sufficient free space is maintained in advance, rather than waiting until space is exhausted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring the free space status of the storage medium and using this information to dynamically adjust data deletion decisions. The control unit responds to space conditions by selectively removing low-priority recordings, maintaining a balance between storage utilization and recording reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple hard disks are used for double recording, then recording reliability is improved, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording reliabilityVSAvoidstorage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of duplicating entire recordings across multiple disks, the system applies local quality differentiation by assigning priority levels to individual data items. Only low-priority data is selectively deleted when space is needed, while high-priority data is preserved. This achieves reliability through intelligent data management rather than physical redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a dynamic discard and recover mechanism where low-priority recordings are deleted to make space for new recordings, while high-priority recordings are preserved. This allows the system to maintain reliability for important recordings without requiring multiple storage devices, as the priority-based selection ensures critical data is always protected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Loss of information

If all recorded data is preserved without deletion, then data loss is prevented, but storage space is quickly exhausted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata preservationVSAvoidavailable storage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamics by making the storage contents flexible rather than static. Data items are assigned priority levels that allow the system to dynamically adjust what is preserved and what can be deleted. This enables the storage medium to adapt to space requirements while preserving important data, creating a dynamic balance between data preservation and space availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of data importance by introducing priority levels (high, medium, low). This parameter change allows differential treatment of data items - low-priority data can be deleted to free space, while high-priority data is protected. This transforms the all-or-nothing data preservation approach into a nuanced system that preserves what matters most while managing space efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8644687B2Recording apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US8644687B2 patent drawing
  • US8644687B2 patent drawing
  • US8644687B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a recording apparatus (camcorders, optical disc recorders, etc.), the operator presses down priority designating buttons for designating priorities when recording input image data. An additional information generating section records and holds, in a storage section, additional information indicating priorities of data to be recorded (e.g., “low”, “intermediate”, “high”, or “highest”) which are set, depending on what priority designating button has been pressed down. If recordable remaining space in the storage section detected by the remaining amount detecting section falls below a predetermined value before the start of or during recording of data, a control section overwrites regions in order of priority of data which is stored therein, the lowest first, with data which is about to be recorded or is being recorded, based on the additional information generated by the additional information generating section. Therefore, even if free space in the storage medium becomes small, a decisive moment can be recoded, for example.