Recruitment Bounty System for Candidate Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face inefficiencies in recruiting candidates due to the influx of unqualified candidates and inexperienced recruiters, leading to significant time and resource investment in evaluation and rejection, making the process burdensome and often equivalent to handling it internally.

Innovation Solution

A method that facilitates engagement and communication between companies and recruiters through a computer network, allowing companies to post job positions, receive candidate information, and pay recruiters a bounty upon successful candidate selection, with features like bounty modification, recruiter qualification, and status updates to streamline the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If companies utilize recruiters to find candidates, then the company can access a broader pool of candidates, but the company is inundated with unqualified candidates and experiences increased time and resource investment in evaluation and rejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to candidate poolVSAvoidtime and resource investment in evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized recruitment management system that acts as an intermediary between companies, recruiters, and candidates. This system filters and manages candidate submissions, preventing the inundation of unqualified candidates while maintaining access to a broad pool. The system coordinates between multiple recruiters and companies, efficiently matching candidates to positions without requiring companies to manually evaluate every submission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If companies hire inexperienced recruiters, then the company can reduce recruitment costs, but the quality of candidate selection deteriorates and the recruitment process becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecruitment costVSAvoidquality of candidate selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where companies evaluate recruiters based on the quality of candidates submitted. This feedback loop allows companies to identify and preferentially engage experienced, effective recruiters while still maintaining cost efficiency. The system tracks recruiter performance metrics, enabling companies to make informed decisions about which recruiters to work with, thereby ensuring reliable candidate selection without overspending.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If companies evaluate and reject numerous unqualified candidates through recruiters, then the company can maintain hiring standards, but the burden becomes so significant that internal recruitment becomes equally attractive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehiring standardsVSAvoidrecruitment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recruitment process into distinct functions handled by different parties: recruiters generate and submit candidate profiles, the centralized system filters and manages submissions, and companies evaluate only pre-screened candidates. This segmentation maintains hiring standards through systematic filtering while dramatically improving recruitment efficiency by eliminating the need for companies to manually evaluate every unqualified candidate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8190531B2Method to facilitate engagement and communication between a company and a recruiter including a bounty
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 BOUNTYJOBS INC
  • US8190531B2 patent drawing
  • US8190531B2 patent drawing
  • US8190531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention includes a method to facilitate engagement and communication between a company with an available position and a recruiter. The method includes the steps of posting information about the available position for the company, and receiving information about a candidate for the available position of the company from the recruiter, and submitting the information about the candidate for the available position of the company to the company. The method further includes the step of receiving payment from the company and transmitting a portion of the payment to the recruiter upon the selection by the company of a candidate for the available position.