Rectangular Border Wire Spring Assembly for Nestable Bedding Foundations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bedding foundations with round border wires are bulky and costly to ship due to space requirements, and using smaller diameter wires to reduce material while maintaining beam strength has not been effectively achieved.

Innovation Solution

A bedding foundation with a nestably stackable spring assembly featuring a rectangular border wire configuration, allowing for the use of a four-gauge wire instead of a three-gauge wire, which reduces material usage and shipping costs without compromising beam strength, by reshaping the wire from a circular to a rectangular cross-section.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If round border wire is used, then the spring assembly can be manufactured with standard materials, but the shipping space requirements increase and costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidshipping volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by changing the border wire cross-section from a symmetric circular shape to a rectangular shape. This rectangular configuration allows the spring assembly to be nested more efficiently during shipping, reducing the overall shipping volume while maintaining structural integrity and beam strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If three-gauge wire is used, then beam strength is maintained, but material cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam strengthVSAvoidwire weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from three-gauge round wire to four-gauge rectangular wire. The rectangular cross-section geometry compensates for the smaller wire gauge, maintaining the necessary beam strength while reducing the overall wire weight and material cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of stationary object

If four-gauge wire is used, then material cost is reduced, but beam strength decreases unless wire shape is changed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire weightVSAvoidbeam strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining four-gauge wire with a rectangular cross-sectional geometry. This composite approach (material + shape) achieves the same beam strength as three-gauge round wire while using less material, thereby reducing both weight and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Quantity of substance

If smaller diameter wire is used, then material usage is reduced, but structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire material quantityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using a rectangular cross-section instead of a circular one. This asymmetric shape distribution optimizes the material layout to maintain structural integrity and beam strength while using less wire material overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by altering the wire cross-section geometry from circular to rectangular. This geometric parameter change allows smaller gauge wire to achieve the same structural performance, reducing material quantity while preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The rectangular border wire configuration enables the use of less steel, reducing manufacturing costs and allowing for secure connections between support wires and the border wire, facilitating efficient stacking and shipping while maintaining structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

The support wires are generally corrugated along their lengths, having a plurality of flattened peaks and a plurality of flattened valleys. The flattened peaks are generally co-planar with the plane defined by the border wire, and the flattened valleys are displaced beneath and intermediate of the peaks.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS8327475B2Bedding foundation having nestably stackable spring assembly welded to border wire with generally rectangular cross-section
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 L & P PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO
  • US8327475B2 patent drawing
  • US8327475B2 patent drawing
  • US8327475B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bedding foundation having a nestably stackable spring assembly, including a border wire having a generally rectangular cross-section. The foundation's spring assembly may be nestably stacked with numerous other such assemblies for transportation, thereby avoiding the need to compress and tie the assembly for shipping. Each foundation assembly includes a number of corrugated support wires having alternating peaks and valleys. The border wire is generally rectangular in cross-section to reduce wire costs without compromising beam strength of the border wire.