Rectilinear Stem Spinal Implant for Minimally Invasive Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for sacroiliac joint and spinal fixation or fusion often require invasive procedures, large incisions, and the removal of cartilage, which can be painful and disruptive, and lack effective minimally invasive alternatives for stabilization and fusion.

Innovation Solution

The development of a bone implant system featuring a stem portion with a rectilinear cross-sectional area and a tulip or saddle structure, allowing for secure rod placement and stabilization, which can be implanted through minimally invasive techniques without joint preparation or cartilage removal, using a lateral or posterolateral approach to minimize tissue disruption and promote bony ingrowth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional screw and plate methods are used for sacroiliac joint fusion, then reliable fixation is achieved, but large incisions and cartilage removal are required causing significant tissue disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation reliabilityVSAvoidtissue disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into distinct functional segments: a stem portion for bone anchoring, a head portion for rod connection, and an integrated fixation mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while minimizing overall invasiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of removing cartilage and using large incisions to access the joint (traditional approach), the implant is inserted through a minimally invasive lateral approach that preserves the joint structure. The fixation mechanism is inverted from external plates and screws to an internal stem-head-rod system that achieves stability without joint preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If minimally invasive techniques are used, then tissue disruption is reduced, but achieving stable fixation and preventing rotation or micromotion becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue disruptionVSAvoidfixation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The implant utilizes composite construction combining different material properties: the stem portion for bone engagement, the head portion for rod articulation, and integrated locking mechanisms. This composite design achieves both minimally invasive insertion and robust stabilization against rotation and micromotion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The rectilinear cross-sectional area of the stem portion provides enhanced rotational stability in the lateral approach, while the tulip or saddle structure at the head portion enables controlled articulation with the rod. This dimensional design ensures stability is achieved through geometric constraints rather than extensive tissue disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a rectilinear cross-sectional stem is used, then rotational stability is improved, but insertion through minimally invasive approaches becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidinsertion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A cavity is pre-formed in the bone through minimally invasive techniques before implant insertion. This preliminary preparation allows the rectilinear stem to be inserted without requiring extensive soft tissue dissection or large incisions, thereby maintaining both rotational stability and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240407810A1Implants for spinal fixation or fusion
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 SI BONE INC
  • US20240407810A1 patent drawing
  • US20240407810A1 patent drawing
  • US20240407810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to bone implants. More specifically, the present invention relates to bone implants used for the fixation or fusion of the sacroiliac joint and/or the spine. For example, a system for fusing or stabilizing a plurality of bones is provided. The system includes an implant structure having stem portion and a head portion, the stem portion having a rectilinear cross sectional area. A tulip or saddle structure can be attached to the head portion, and a rod can be secured within the tulip or saddle structure.