Recumbent Bicycle Frame Segmentation for Structural Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stationary exercise bicycles face issues of unreliability, inadequate structural sturdiness, limited foot and pedal movement, and ineffective heart rate monitoring, particularly in recumbent designs.

Innovation Solution

A sturdy, mechanically basic recumbent bicycle with adjustable components for user fit, a meter for tracking exercise metrics, and compatibility with standalone heart rate monitors to ensure reliable and comprehensive user data, featuring a horizontal backbone structure, fork assembly, and adjustable resistance mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If recumbent bicycle design is used to involve more musculature, then exercise effectiveness is improved, but structural sturdiness becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexercise effectivenessVSAvoidstructural sturdiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bicycle frame is divided into multiple backbone sections (first backbone section, second backbone section) connected by a box frame, with the resistance mechanism separated into a distinct fork assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structural design combining rigid backbone sections with a centralized box frame connection. This composite approach creates a sturdy yet adaptable framework that supports the recumbent design's exercise effectiveness while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If complex electronic systems are added for monitoring, then measurement capability is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring capabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The meter is designed to display multiple exercise metrics (time, speed, distance, calories) through a single integrated unit. This multi-functional approach provides comprehensive monitoring capability while avoiding the reliability issues associated with multiple separate electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows compatibility with standalone heart rate monitors that users can attach independently. This self-service approach lets users choose their preferred monitoring method without requiring the bicycle's integrated system to be perfectly reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Area of stationary object

If foot placement space is restricted, then device compactness is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidfoot movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The recumbent design positions the pedals and footrest area in a three-dimensional space that naturally provides adequate foot movement room without increasing the bicycle's footprint. The horizontal backbone configuration creates vertical and lateral space for free foot placement and rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If adjustable components are added for user fit, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser fit adjustmentVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The body rest and headrest are pre-configured with adjustable mechanisms that allow users to quickly modify the setup for different body types. These adjustments are built into the basic structure, requiring minimal additional components while providing significant adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8696526B1Stationary recumbent bicycle device
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 DEW MARIO D
  • US8696526B1 patent drawing
  • US8696526B1 patent drawing
  • US8696526B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The stationary recumbent bicycle device is foremost mechanically basic. Design was principally concerned with basic, sturdy construction to avoid any functional or structural failures. The horizontal backbones provide rigidity, especially being coupled to the centrally disposed box frame. The rigidity continues with the backbone riser and backbone angle, and on through the sturdy fork assembly. Importantly, the body rest and the headrest assembly are easily and quickly adjusted to user fit. By being recumbent, the device involves more musculature than does an upright bicycle.