Recurrent Attention Image Processing for Efficient Glimpse-Based Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image classification systems require extensive processing of entire images, which is computationally inefficient and not scalable with the number of pixels, especially in dynamic environments where real-time decision-making is necessary.

Innovation Solution

A recurrent attention image processing system that extracts glimpses from images using a glimpse sensor, processes these glimpses through neural networks to select actions and determine locations, reducing the need to process the entire image, and employs end-to-end optimization for reinforcement learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the entire image is processed by neural networks, then classification accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image processing task into multiple stages: first extracting salient regions using a region proposal network, then processing only these regions through the classification neural network. This segmentation approach maintains classification accuracy by focusing computational resources on relevant image portions while significantly reducing overall computational complexity compared to processing the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and processes only the most relevant portions of the image (salient regions) rather than the entire image. By using a region proposal network to identify and extract key areas containing objects of interest, the system reduces computational complexity while preserving classification accuracy by concentrating processing power on informative regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If the entire image is processed, then complete information is obtained, but processing time increases and real-time performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing into two phases: a fast region proposal stage that identifies salient areas, and a classification stage that processes only these regions. This maintains information completeness by ensuring all relevant objects are captured in the region proposals while dramatically reducing processing time by avoiding computation on background and irrelevant areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only a subset of the image (the salient regions identified by the region proposal network) rather than the entire image. This partial processing approach maintains sufficient information for accurate classification while reducing processing time to enable real-time performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If more pixels are processed, then classification accuracy improves, but computational requirements scale unfavorably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the essential portions of the image containing objects of interest, as identified by the region proposal network. This extraction approach maintains classification accuracy by focusing computational resources on pixels that contribute most to correct classification while significantly reducing the total number of pixels processed, thereby lowering computational requirements and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different processing levels to different regions of the image: salient regions containing objects receive full classification processing, while background regions receive minimal or no processing. This differential approach maintains classification accuracy for important objects while reducing overall computational requirements by avoiding unnecessary processing of irrelevant areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12406031B1Generating predictions characterizing images using glimpses extracted from the images
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US12406031B1 patent drawing
  • US12406031B1 patent drawing
  • US12406031B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for processing images using recurrent attention. One of the methods includes determining a location in the first image; extracting a glimpse from the first image using the location; generating a glimpse representation of the extracted glimpse; processing the glimpse representation using a recurrent neural network to update a current internal state of the recurrent neural network to generate a new internal state; processing the new internal state to select a location in a next image in the image sequence after the first image; and processing the new internal state to select an action from a predetermined set of possible actions.