Recurrent Categorization Engine for Electronic Document Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern document and content management systems face limitations in human search efficiency, particularly when dealing with large numbers of electronic documents, as users often struggle to review thousands of search results, leading to ineffective document retrieval.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing recurrent categorization to group electronic documents into a limited number of balanced categories and sub-categories based on rule-based categorization, dynamically generating user prompts to facilitate more precise searching, and allowing further categorization until a manageable number of documents is reached.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a search engine returns thousands of search results, then the storage and indexing functionality is good, but the user cannot review all results effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiduser review efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large set of search results into multiple categorized groups based on metadata attributes (e.g., document type, date, author, department). Instead of presenting thousands of individual documents, the system groups them into manageable categories with representative samples, allowing users to navigate through organized sections rather than overwhelming lists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary categorization layer between the search engine and the user. This intermediary process analyzes document metadata, applies categorization rules, and presents grouped results with summaries or representative documents. Users interact with this intermediary representation rather than directly with the raw search results, improving review efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the search engine provides detailed search results, then the information completeness is good, but the time required to review results increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts key metadata attributes from documents (such as document type, creation date, author, department, keywords) and uses these extracted features for categorization. Instead of requiring users to review entire documents or detailed abstracts, the system presents categorized groups based on these extracted attributes, maintaining information completeness while reducing review time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary categorization and organization of search results before presenting them to users. By pre-grouping documents into categories based on metadata analysis, the system prepares the information in an easily navigable format in advance, eliminating the need for users to spend time manually sorting or filtering results during review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system groups documents into many categories, then the categorization precision is good, but the complexity of the interface increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization precisionVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different numbers and types of categories at different levels of the interface. The top-level view presents a manageable number of broad categories, while deeper levels or specific sections can have more granular categorization. This localized approach to categorization density maintains precision where needed while keeping the overall interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic categorization where the number and structure of displayed categories can change based on user interactions, search context, and document distribution. The system can dynamically adjust the level of categorization detail shown, collapsing or expanding categories as users navigate, thus maintaining interface simplicity while providing precise categorization when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11640413B2Content management system for electronic documents using recurrent categorization
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11640413B2 patent drawing
  • US11640413B2 patent drawing
  • US11640413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A content management system categorizes electronic documents stored in a document storage database. The electronic documents include metadata. The content management system includes a categorization rules database of categorization rules. A recurrent categorization engine takes the rules and applies them to the electronic documents to generate a plurality of category groupings. Each category grouping includes groups based on the applicable rule used to create the grouping. The electronic documents are grouped between the groups. The most balanced dataset of groups is selected to generate a user prompt for further categorization of the electronic documents.