Recycling Incentive System with Dynamic Payment Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low recycling rates due to inconvenience, lack of motivation, and inadequate incentives for consumers to recycle, resulting in recyclable materials ending up in landfills and contributing to environmental pollution.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for a recycling company to register recyclers, evaluate recyclable materials, and offer incentives such as raffles and prizes funded by a portion of the recyclers' earnings, encouraging participation and increasing recycling rates through a bank account system that allows donations, loans, or payments for raffles and prizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If recyclers receive little money for recycling, then the recycling process remains simple and low-cost, but consumer motivation to recycle is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of recycling processVSAvoidrecycling participation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the payment parameter from fixed low rates to variable rates based on material type, quantity, and consumer behavior. The system dynamically adjusts reimbursement amounts to increase consumer motivation while maintaining operational simplicity through automated evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to consumers through a database that tracks recycling history, material types, and payment amounts. This feedback mechanism motivates consumers by showing them their recycling impact and accumulated rewards, increasing participation without complicating the basic recycling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If recyclers must organize and invest time to recycle, then recycling can be done systematically, but consumer convenience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystematic recyclingVSAvoidconsumer convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated material evaluation and payment processing. The system automatically identifies, evaluates, and compensates recyclers without requiring manual organization or time investment from consumers, maintaining systematic recycling while maximizing convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by using automated detection and evaluation methods that eliminate the need for consumer organization. The database automatically tracks and processes recycling transactions, transforming the process from labor-intensive to automated while preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If recyclers wait in line at recycling facilities, then recycling can be processed in order, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing orderVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical queue-based processing system with an automated database-driven system. The system uses computer-based evaluation and payment processing to eliminate physical waiting lines, maintaining orderly processing through digital records while dramatically reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous automated processing of recycling transactions through the database, eliminating interruptions caused by waiting in line. The automated evaluation and payment system operates continuously without the time losses associated with sequential manual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Device complexity

If recycling facilities operate with basic infrastructure, then operational costs are low, but consumer incentive is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility infrastructureVSAvoidrecycling demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computer-based intermediary system (database and evaluation system) that mediates between the simple recycling facilities and consumers. This intermediary enables sophisticated evaluation and incentive mechanisms without requiring complex facility infrastructure, increasing recycling demand while keeping operational costs manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the incentive parameter by using database-driven variable payment rates that respond to material type, quantity, and consumer history. This creates strong consumer incentives without requiring complex facility infrastructure, as the sophisticated evaluation occurs through software rather than physical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9002742B2Computer implemented method for a recycling company to increase recycling demand
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 DUMAS ELISAH
  • US9002742B2 patent drawing
  • US9002742B2 patent drawing
  • US9002742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Proposed is a computer-implemented method for a recycling company to increase recycling demand, the computer including a processor system having at least one processor and a memory system. The method comprises registering, by the computer, a recycler with a recycling company, wherein the recycler obtains identification. The computer then enters the recycler's identification to begin a transaction for recycling. The type of material to be recycled is entered into the computer. The processor system evaluates a value for the recyclable material and determines the total payment to be paid to the recycler. A portion that is less than or equal to the total payment given to a fund is entered into the computer, and the final payment to be paid to the recycler is computed. The final payment is the total payment less the portion given to the fund. On completion of the above operations, the transaction is logged.