Redistribution Power-Ground Layout for Flexible Lower-Layer Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In integrated circuit component manufacturing, the pre-designed power and ground macros limit design flexibility by occupying entire chip areas, preventing the use of these areas for routing other features due to their fixed nature.

Innovation Solution

The design of power-ground (PG) networks in redistribution structures involves placing PG macros only in upper layers, leaving lower layers free for other features, and using a shortest-path scheme to reduce resistance and enhance flexibility by allowing other features to be routed beneath the PG macros.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If pre-designed power and ground macros are used in the layout, then design convenience and efficiency are improved, but design flexibility deteriorates because the entire macro area cannot be used for routing other features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign convenienceVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power-ground network into modular macros that can be independently placed and connected. Each macro is a self-contained unit with defined power and ground connections, allowing designers to select and place individual macros without being constrained by large fixed-area blocks. This segmentation enables flexible routing of other features around and between macros while maintaining design efficiency through standardized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes multiple metal layers to route power and ground connections in three-dimensional space. By distributing power-ground macros across different layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3) and connecting them through vertical vias, the design achieves flexibility in the horizontal plane while maintaining electrical connectivity through the vertical dimension. This layered approach allows signal routing in areas where macros are present without compromising power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If entire macros are tied to VDD or VSS, then power delivery is simplified, but chip area utilization deteriorates because occupied areas cannot be used for other features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower network simplicityVSAvoidchip area utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The power-ground network is divided into discrete, independently connectable macros rather than large continuous blocks. Each macro can be selectively connected to VDD or VSS based on local requirements, and other chip features can be routed in the spaces between macros or through areas not occupied by macro footprints. This segmentation increases chip area utilization while maintaining simplified power delivery through standardized macro units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The macros are designed as universal building blocks that can serve multiple functions: power delivery, ground reference, and potential signal routing pathways. By making macros multi-functional and independently configurable, the same macro structure can accommodate different design requirements without wasting chip area, as macros can be placed only where needed rather than requiring large reserved regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If PG macros extend into lower layers, then power network connectivity is improved, but routing flexibility deteriorates because lower layers are occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower network connectivityVSAvoidrouting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent confines power-ground macros to upper metal layers (e.g., layer 1, layer 2, layer 3) and uses vertical vias to establish power and ground connections through the substrate. This layered configuration ensures reliable power network connectivity within the macro-containing layers while leaving lower layers completely free for signal routing and other features. The vertical via connections provide the necessary electrical continuity without occupying horizontal space in lower layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The power network is segmented into upper-layer macro structures with vertical connections, separating the power delivery function from the signal routing function in lower layers. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for its specific purpose: upper layers for power distribution through macros, lower layers for flexible signal routing, without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11929340B2Arrangement of power-grounds in package structures
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11929340B2 patent drawing
  • US11929340B2 patent drawing
  • US11929340B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure includes a redistribution structure, which includes a bottom layer and a plurality of upper layers over the bottom layer. The redistribution structure also includes a power-ground macro extending from a topmost layer in the plurality of upper layers to a bottommost layer in the plurality of upper layers, and a metal pad in the bottom layer and overlapped by the power-ground macro. The metal pad is electrically disconnected from the power-ground macro.