Redox-Active Electrode Interfaces for Faster Flow Battery Charge Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) face limitations in power and energy densities due to slow charge transfer reactions, high raw material costs, and ion crossover, particularly in iron and zinc-based chemistries, which hinder their performance and scalability for energy storage applications.

Innovation Solution

Modifying electrodes with oxidatively activated carbon materials containing iron or other redox active components, such as iron nanoparticles, to enhance Faradaic charge transfer and reduce activation energy, thereby improving power and energy densities, and using redox mediators to facilitate efficient charge interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If iron or zinc-based redox chemistry is used in RFBs, then raw material costs are reduced, but Faradaic charge transfer interactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveraw material costVSAvoidFaradaic charge transfer interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces redox-active particles (mediators) that are incorporated into the electrode structure to facilitate charge transfer between the electrode and iron/zinc-based electrolytes. These particles act as intermediaries that improve the poor Faradaic charge transfer interactions inherent to non-vanadium chemistries, enabling cheap iron and zinc systems to achieve performance comparable to expensive vanadium systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite electrode materials by combining conductive carbon matrices with redox-active particles (such as iron oxides, hydroxides, or other transition metal compounds). This composite structure leverages the electrical conductivity of carbon while incorporating the redox activity of the particles, thereby enhancing the overall charge transfer performance of electrodes using economical iron or zinc-based electrolytes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Power

If electrode area is increased to improve power density, then charge transfer rate improves, but device complexity and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidelectrode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances the local charge transfer capability at the electrode/electrolyte interface by incorporating redox-active particles specifically at the surface and within the porous structure of the electrode. This localized enhancement of redox activity means that high power density can be achieved without proportionally increasing the total electrode area, thereby reducing system complexity and material requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical and physical parameters of the electrode material by incorporating redox-active particles with specific properties (such as iron oxide nanoparticles with particular crystal structures or surface areas). These parameter changes enable more efficient charge transfer per unit area, allowing power density improvement without linearly increasing electrode size or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If vanadium RFBs are used, then electrochemical performance is improved and ion crossover is reduced, but raw material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrochemical performanceVSAvoidraw material cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive iron or zinc-based electrolytes that can be used in RFB systems despite their initially poor performance. By combining these cheap electrolytes with redox-active particle-modified electrodes, the system achieves acceptable performance at low material cost, effectively replacing expensive vanadium electrolytes with economical alternatives that maintain sufficient reliability for energy storage applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modified electrodes achieve a significant increase in power and energy densities, reducing material costs and ion crossover, making iron and zinc-based RFBs more viable for energy storage, particularly in intermittent energy sources like solar and wind.

Implementation Method 1

Redox electrolytes are stable in solution in multiple oxidation states to facilitate the oxidation and reduction processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

oxidatively activating carbon materials containing iron or other redox active materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS11799091B2Redox-active interfaces for accelerated liquid-solid charge transfer reactions
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
  • US11799091B2 patent drawing
  • US11799091B2 patent drawing
  • US11799091B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is a redox flow battery comprising an anode comprising anodic redox mediators; a negative electrolyte tank comprising an anolyte; and an anode pump capable of circulating the anolyte through the anode. The redox flow battery further comprises a cathode comprising cathodic redox mediators; a positive electrolyte tank comprising a catholyte and a cathode pump capable of circulating the catholyte through the cathode. A separator is between the anode and cathode.