Redox Shuttle Synthesis via Cesium Carbonate Alkylation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing redox shuttles for lithium-ion batteries are inefficient, requiring hazardous reagents, expensive solvents, and complex processes, resulting in low yields and unsuitable for industrial scale-up, with existing protocols producing less than 10 grams per batch and requiring inert environments and lengthy reaction times.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an alkylation reaction using 2,5-di-tert-butylbenzene-1,4-diol with cesium carbonate in an aprotic solvent, which reduces reaction time to 5-7 hours, increases yield to 80%, and eliminates the need for hazardous reagents and chromatography, enabling production of 500 grams or more of 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)benzene, a high-voltage redox shuttle, in an open-air environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional redox shuttle production methods are used, then the reaction can proceed with standard reagents, but the reaction time is excessively long (17 hours) and yield is low (60%)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the reaction system by using cesium carbonate instead of conventional bases like sodium hydride, and by conducting the reaction in dimethyl carbonate rather than traditional solvents. These parameter changes result in dramatically reduced reaction time (from 17 hours to under 8 hours) and improved yield (from 60% to 80%), while also eliminating the need for inert atmospheres and hazardous reagents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional production methods are used, then the reaction can proceed, but hazardous reagents (sodium hydride, peroxide-forming tetrahydrofuran) must be used requiring inert environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess safetyVSAvoidhazardous reagents and explosion risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, hazardous, and sensitive reagents (sodium hydride requiring inert atmosphere, peroxide-forming tetrahydrofuran) with safer, more stable alternatives (cesium carbonate, dimethyl carbonate). These alternative reagents are less hazardous, do not require inert environments, and eliminate explosion risks from hydrogen generation and peroxide formation, thereby improving process safety and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional production methods are used, then the reaction can proceed, but the process produces a complex mixture requiring large volumes of toxic solvents for separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification simplicityVSAvoidsolvent volume and toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the purification process by eliminating the need for complex chromatographic separations and large volumes of toxic solvents like dichloromethane. The improved reaction selectivity and conditions produce a cleaner product mixture that requires minimal purification, thereby reducing solvent consumption and eliminating the use of highly toxic and persistent pollutants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If conventional production methods are used, then the reaction can proceed, but the initial batch size is less than 0.1 grams making it unsuitable for industrial scale-up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch sizeVSAvoidprocess complexity for scale-up
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universally applicable production method that works effectively from small laboratory scales to large industrial scales. The simplified reaction conditions, elimination of inert atmosphere requirements, and improved safety profile make the process easily scalable. The same basic protocol can be applied whether producing milligrams in the lab or kilograms in industrial reactors, without requiring complex modifications or specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high-purity redox shuttle production in industrial quantities, ensuring safety and efficiency, with no hazardous byproducts, and maintains the stability and performance of the shuttle, facilitating industrial-scale lithium-ion battery electrolyte production.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing 2,5-di-tert butylbenzene-1,4-diol in an alkylation reaction to create 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)benzene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAlkylation reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS8921611B1Process for producing redox shuttles
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC
  • US8921611B1 patent drawing
  • US8921611B1 patent drawing
  • US8921611B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method for preparing 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)benzene, the method comprising reacting 2,5-di-tert-butylbenzene-1,4-diol with cesium carbonate and halogenated ether in dimethyl formamide. The method yields 500 gram batches at a time, or multiples thereof. The method enables the industrial production of redox shuttles for use in lithium ion battery systems.