Reduced Beneš Switching Matrix for Cost-Effective Telecommunications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current telecommunications networks face high costs and inefficiencies in managing physical connections due to the need for frequent reconfigurations and manual connection setups, especially with the introduction of new services and increased competition, which is exacerbated by the asymmetry and high initial costs of traditional switching matrices.

Innovation Solution

A method for specifying a switching matrix using a reduced Beneš network with a plurality of interconnected switching elements, where the number of elements and connections are adapted to specific ingress and egress ports, allowing for equal arrangement and interchanging of switching elements to maintain functionality while reducing costs and production complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional cross bar switching matrix is used to provide non-blocking functionality, then connection flexibility is improved, but the initial deployment cost increases due to the square relationship between the number of cross bars and the number of cross points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection flexibilityVSAvoidinitial deployment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The switching matrix is divided into multiple stages of switching elements rather than using a single large cross bar matrix. This segmentation reduces the number of switching elements required while maintaining non-blocking functionality through the multi-stage architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Intermediate switching stages are introduced between the input and output ports. These intermediate stages act as mediators that enable connections to be established with fewer total switching elements compared to a direct cross bar approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If the number of switching elements is reduced to lower costs, then manufacturing cost is improved, but the asymmetry in the switching matrix increases making production more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidasymmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent accepts and utilizes the asymmetry in the switching matrix configuration as a result of reducing the number of switching elements. The design embraces this asymmetry rather than attempting to maintain symmetry, thereby achieving cost reduction without requiring complex symmetric structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If manual connection setup is used to ensure reliable physical connections, then connection reliability is improved, but the overhead cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidservice deployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching matrix enables automated connection setup and reconfiguration without requiring manual intervention by service engineers. The system can autonomously establish and modify connections based on service requirements, eliminating the need for physical visits to service boxes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Physical manual connection operations are replaced with electronic control of the switching elements. The mechanical act of manually connecting cables is substituted with electronic switching control, allowing remote and automated provisioning of services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If service engineers visit service boxes to make connections, then connection accuracy is improved, but the overhead cost and customer waiting time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection accuracyVSAvoidcustomer waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The switching matrix system performs connection operations autonomously without requiring service engineer visits. The automated switching control ensures accurate connection establishment while eliminating customer waiting time associated with manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8737391B2Switching matrix and method for specifying a switching matrix
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US8737391B2 patent drawing
  • US8737391B2 patent drawing
  • US8737391B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of specifying a switching matrix over a Bene{hacek over (s)} network involves specifying a first number of ingress ports and a second number of egress ports for the matrix. Switching elements and connections between the switching elements are configured to the number of ports, and the matrix is subdivided into a plurality of sections. The switching elements and ports are moved and/or turned to obtain certain configurations, but connections are retained.