Reduced Genome Bacteria for Stable Gene Cloning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bacterial hosts, such as E. coli, have high mutation rates due to intrinsic mechanisms that lead to unwanted genotypic and phenotypic alterations, making it difficult to clone certain genes, especially those encoding error-prone DNA polymerases, which are essential for maintaining genetic stability in laboratory settings.

Innovation Solution

Development of reduced genome bacteria with non-functional genes encoding DNA Polymerase II, IV, and V, achieved through deletion or disruption, resulting in a genome that is 5-30% smaller than the native parent strain and lacking insertion sequences, providing a stable host for cloning difficult genes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If genes encoding error-prone DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV, Pol V) are kept functional in E. coli, then the bacteria can survive in natural environments with high mutation rates beneficial for adaptation, but in laboratory settings this leads to unwanted genotypic and phenotypic alterations and genetic instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic stabilityVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the DNA polymerase functions by selectively inactivating specific error-prone polymerase genes (polB for Pol II, dinB for Pol IV, umuDC for Pol V) while preserving other essential polymerase functions. This segmentation allows the bacteria to maintain genetic stability for cloning purposes while retaining sufficient adaptability through other DNA repair and replication mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful error-prone DNA polymerase functions from the bacterial system by deleting or inactivating the specific genes encoding Pol II, Pol IV, and Pol V. This extraction eliminates the source of unwanted mutations while preserving the essential replication functions carried out by other polymerases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the bacterial genome is reduced by deleting nonessential genes to improve cloning stability, then genetic stability improves and genome size decreases, but the bacteria may lose essential functions needed for survival or protein production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecloning stabilityVSAvoidprotein production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making specific targeted modifications to the genome (inactivating only polB, dinB, and umuDC genes) rather than broad reductions. This localized approach affects only the specific error-prone polymerase functions while preserving other genes essential for protein production and bacterial survival, thus maintaining high cloning stability without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the functional state of specific genes from active to inactive (parameter change) without altering the overall genome structure or other essential functions. By changing the activity parameter of only the error-prone polymerase genes while maintaining all other parameters normal, the bacteria achieve improved cloning stability while retaining full protein production capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple genes are deleted to create a reduced genome strain, then the genome becomes smaller and more stable, but the complexity of strain development and characterization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenome stabilityVSAvoidstrain development complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric gene inactivation strategies where different combinations of polymerase genes are targeted (single, double, or triple deletions) depending on the specific application requirements. This asymmetric approach allows flexible optimization of stability versus complexity trade-offs, enabling users to choose the appropriate level of gene deletion based on their specific cloning needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification and selection of target genes (polB, dinB, umuDC) based on their known error-prone characteristics before conducting the actual deletion experiments. This preliminary action provides a clear roadmap for strain development, reducing the complexity of the overall process by pre-determining which genes should be targeted and what outcomes to expect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If error-prone DNA polymerases are inactivated to reduce mutation rates, then nucleic acid fidelity improves, but the bacteria's ability to generate genetic diversity for survival in changing environments is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenucleic acid fidelityVSAvoidgenetic diversity generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple DNA polymerase functions into a coordinated system where the error-prone polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV, Pol V) are inactivated but other replication and repair polymerases remain functional. This merging of remaining functions creates a complementary system that maintains high nucleic acid fidelity for cloning while preserving sufficient genetic adaptability through alternative DNA repair pathways and replication mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful error-prone mutation activity into a benefit by selectively removing it. The error-prone polymerases, which normally cause unwanted mutations, are inactivated to provide high-fidelity cloning. However, the bacteria retain other DNA repair and replication mechanisms that can generate controlled genetic diversity when needed, thus converting the potential harm of complete polymerase inactivation into the benefit of controlled fidelity with retained adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentEP2768943B1Reduced genome bacteria with improved genetic stability
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 SCARAB GENOMICS LLC
  • EP2768943B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2768943B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2768943B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Reduced genome bacteria with improved genetic stability are provided. Also provided are methods of producing polypeptides using the reduced genome bacteria with improved genetic stability.