Reduced LLM Quantization for Consumer Device Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large language models (LLMs) are not suited for use on individual computing devices due to their massive size and processing requirements, and they lack the ability to generate content in a user's own style or voice.

Innovation Solution

A reduced-sized LLM is created through optimization processes such as quantization, which analyzes parameters to reduce their precision and storage requirements, allowing the LLM to be stored and executed on consumer-grade devices. This reduced LLM can then be trained to generate content in the user's style or voice.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large language model is used, then content generation capability is improved, but device resource requirements (memory and processing power) increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation capabilityVSAvoidmodel size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential components of a large language model needed for content generation, removing unnecessary parameters and computational complexity. This allows the model to function effectively on consumer devices without requiring the full scale of enterprise-grade LLMs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the language model including reducing the number of parameters, adjusting model depth and width, and modifying computational operations to be more efficient. These parameter changes enable the model to maintain content generation capabilities while fitting within consumer device resource constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If model precision is reduced through quantization, then storage requirements decrease, but processing accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage requirementsVSAvoidprocessing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies quantization to change the precision parameters of model weights and activations, converting high-precision floating-point values to lower-precision representations. This reduces storage requirements while the patent compensates for accuracy loss through optimized computation methods and architectural adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional high-precision floating-point arithmetic with alternative computational approaches that are more efficient on consumer hardware. This substitution maintains acceptable accuracy levels while significantly reducing computational overhead and storage needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If a reduced-sized LLM is created, then ease of operation on consumer devices is improved, but content generation quality may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidcontent generation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different optimization strategies to different parts of the model architecture. Critical components that most impact content generation quality are preserved with higher fidelity, while less critical components are more aggressively optimized for size and speed. This localized approach maintains quality where it matters most while achieving overall reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic elements to the reduced model that allow it to adapt its behavior based on input complexity and context. This enables the smaller model to compensate for its reduced capacity by being more strategic about when and how it applies computational resources, maintaining quality output across diverse content generation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250140245A1Portable personalized large language models
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US20250140245A1 patent drawing
  • US20250140245A1 patent drawing
  • US20250140245A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes transmitting, by a client device, a request for a reduced large language model (“LLM”) to a remote server; receiving, by the client device from the remote server, and storing the reduced LLM, the reduced LLM based on a trained general LLM; receiving, by the client device, a request to generate content using the reduced LLM; providing the request to the reduced LLM; and receiving generated content from the reduced LLM based on the request.