Reduced-Order Reservoir Models for Faster Forecast Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional hydrocarbon reservoir workflows require significant computational resources and time, delaying decision-making and increasing costs due to the use of high-dimensional parameter space data models.

Innovation Solution

Implementing model-order reduction techniques, history matching techniques, and optimization techniques to generate workflows with a reduced parameter space, using a flow simulator and algorithms like Bayesian optimization to enhance computational efficiency while maintaining accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional high-dimensional parameter space data models are used, then forecast accuracy is maintained, but computational cost and execution time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecast accuracyVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies a subset of critical input variables from the high-dimensional parameter space using sensitivity analysis and correlation techniques. This extraction process separates the most influential parameters that drive forecast accuracy from the less important ones, allowing the system to maintain accuracy while reducing computational burden by focusing only on the essential variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy or proxy model that replicates the behavior of the complex high-dimensional model using fewer parameters. This reduced-order model is trained on data from the full model and then used for actual forecasting, providing a computationally efficient alternative that maintains acceptable accuracy for reservoir management decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If complex workflows are used, then forecast accuracy is improved, but computational resources and execution time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecast accuracyVSAvoidworkflow complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex workflow into distinct modular components: data preprocessing, sensitivity analysis, variable selection, model training, and forecasting. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently optimized or replaced. This segmentation reduces overall complexity while maintaining the analytical depth needed for accurate forecasts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic variable selection where the set of input variables is not fixed but adapts based on the specific reservoir being analyzed. The system dynamically identifies which parameters are most relevant for each case, allowing the workflow complexity to adjust to the actual needs of each forecasting task rather than always using the full complex model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If high-dimensional parameter space models are used, then accurate predictions are achieved, but decision-making speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddecision-making speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary sensitivity analysis and variable importance assessment before the actual forecasting process. This preliminary action identifies and pre-selects the most influential parameters, so that when forecasting is needed, the system already has a reduced set of variables ready, significantly speeding up the decision-making process without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from high-dimensional raw data to a reduced set of transformed parameters or principal components that capture the essential variability. This parameter transformation maintains the information needed for accurate predictions while reducing the dimensionality, enabling faster computation and quicker decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12416223B2Model parameter reductions and model parameter selection to optimize execution time of reservoir management workflows
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US12416223B2 patent drawing
  • US12416223B2 patent drawing
  • US12416223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for generating forecasts from a high-dimensional parameter data space comprising a reservoir model, a model order reduction module, and an assisted history matching module. The reservoir model having input variables, output variables, and an algorithmic model. The input variables, output variables, and the algorithmic model are generated by a flow simulator module and from a formation and reservoir properties database and a field production database. The model order reduction module generates a subset of the original or transformed input variables. The assisted history matching module adjust values of the output variables based on a difference between the at least one of the output variables and dynamic field production data to improve model accuracy.