Reductive Activation for Atmospheric Leaching of Metal Sulfides

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for atmospheric leaching of metal sulfides face challenges such as slow reaction kinetics and poor metal recoveries due to surface passivation, which are exacerbated by factors like sulfur product layer formation and residual frothing agents, requiring high energy inputs and inefficient copper dissolution.

Innovation Solution

A reductive activation step is introduced prior to oxidative leaching, converting metal sulfide particles into metastable, non-stoichiometric binary phases to enhance leach kinetics and reduce the need for additional reagents, involving processes like stirred tank and shear tank reactors with controlled redox potentials and pH levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional atmospheric leaching is used to extract metal from sulfide ores, then the process is simpler and uses standard equipment, but metal recovery is poor and reaction kinetics are slow due to surface passivation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidmetal recovery rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting a reductive activation treatment before the main oxidative leaching process. This pre-treatment step converts the metal sulfide surface to a more reactive state, removing passivating layers and creating defects that enhance subsequent leaching kinetics and metal recovery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the redox potential parameter from oxidizing conditions during flotation to reducing conditions during activation, and then back to oxidizing conditions during leaching. This parameter change enables the surface activation that improves metal recovery while maintaining process feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If conventional atmospheric leaching is used, then energy input is reduced, but reaction kinetics remain slow and leach times are extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidreaction kinetics
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The reductive activation step creates a more reactive surface morphology and chemical state before leaching begins. This preliminary modification of the particle surface reduces the activation energy required for subsequent oxidative dissolution, accelerating reaction kinetics without requiring increased energy input during the main leaching process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes redox phase transitions of the metal sulfide surface, cycling between reduced and oxidized states. The reductive phase creates metastable surface phases with higher reactivity, while the subsequent oxidative phase completes the dissolution. This phase transition approach enhances kinetics while operating at atmospheric pressure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Device complexity

If conventional leaching is used, then fewer process steps are required, but metal recovery remains below 95% due to passivation effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of process stepsVSAvoidmetal recovery consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reductive activation step serves as a preliminary action that fundamentally alters the surface chemistry of the metal sulfide particles. By creating a activated surface state with defects and removed passivation layers, this single additional step enables consistent high recovery (>95%) without requiring multiple complex leaching stages or extensive grinding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Speed

If ultra-fine grinding is applied to improve leach kinetics, then reaction surface area increases, but energy consumption and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleach kineticsVSAvoidgrinding energy input
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly grinding the entire particle to ultra-fine sizes, the patent applies local quality changes by selectively modifying only the particle surface through reductive activation. This surface treatment creates locally enhanced reactivity at the particle exterior where leaching occurs, achieving fast kinetics without the energy penalty of bulk particle size reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach (ultra-fine grinding) with a chemical approach (reductive activation). Instead of using mechanical force to increase surface area, the process uses redox chemistry to create a more reactive surface state, substituting chemical transformation for mechanical size reduction to achieve enhanced leach kinetics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces leach time for achieving high metal recovery, with greater than 95% extraction possible in under 6 hours, while minimizing energy consumption and avoiding the use of excessive reagents, thus improving the efficiency and economic feasibility of metal recovery processes.

Implementation Method 1

A reductive activation step is introduced prior to oxidative leaching, converting metal sulfide particles into metastable, non-stoichiometric binary phases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

subsequently processing the activated concentrate by oxidative dissolution to extract metal values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS10023935B2System and method for enhanced metal recovery during atmospheric leaching of metal sulfides
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 F L SMIDTH & CO AS
  • US10023935B2 patent drawing
  • US10023935B2 patent drawing
  • US10023935B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of improving metal leach kinetics and recovery during atmospheric or substantially atmospheric leaching of a metal sulfide is disclosed. In some embodiments, the method may comprise the steps of: (a) producing a metal sulfide flotation concentrate; (b) processing the metal sulfide concentrate in a reductive activation circuit that operates at a first redox potential, to produce a reductively-activated metal sulfide concentrate; and, (c) subsequently processing the activated metal sulfide concentrate in an oxidative leach circuit to extract metal values. In some disclosed embodiments, reductive activation steps may be employed prior to oxidative leaching steps (including heap leap leaching or bio-leaching steps). In some embodiments, physico-chemical processing steps may be employed during reductive activation and/or oxidative leaching. Systems for practicing the aforementioned methods are also disclosed.