Redundant Battery Management System Architecture for Vehicle Fault Tolerance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery system architectures in vehicles are prone to failures, leading to inoperability due to battery, battery controller, or communication link failures, which is unsuitable for reliable operation, especially in autonomous vehicles requiring robustness.

Innovation Solution

A redundant battery management system (BMS) architecture with multiple controllers and battery units, implementing redundant communication pathways and fault detection mechanisms to ensure continued operation by selecting the lower aggregate battery data for conservative configuration and preventing damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional battery system architecture is used, then the system structure is simple, but the reliability deteriorates due to vulnerability to battery, controller, or communication link failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system is divided into multiple independent battery units (first battery unit, second battery unit), each with its own controller. This segmentation allows the system to isolate failures to individual units while maintaining overall functionality through redundant pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements redundant communication pathways and cross-coupling between battery units before failures occur. This preparatory redundancy ensures that when a failure happens (battery, controller, or communication link), the system has pre-established alternative pathways to maintain operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If redundant communication pathways and fault detection mechanisms are implemented, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each battery unit is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a power source and as a redundant backup for the other unit. The controllers can perform both primary control functions and backup/fault detection functions, reducing the need for completely separate redundant components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the battery units themselves as intermediaries for cross-validation and fault detection. Each battery unit monitors and validates data from the other unit, creating a self-checking system that reduces the need for additional external monitoring components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11485238B2Redundant battery management system architecture
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 ZOOX INC
  • US11485238B2 patent drawing
  • US11485238B2 patent drawing
  • US11485238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle can include a battery architecture configured to provide electrical power to motors, accessories, and other components of the vehicle. The architecture can include a controller coupled to multiple battery units. Each battery unit can include a battery and a battery management system. Additionally, each battery unit can be coupled to a controller and to other battery units. Through the use of redundant coupling and redundant data transmitted to and from the controller, battery units, and other components, the architecture can detect a fault and continue to operate while providing an indication of the fault.