Redundant Field Device Evaluation Unit for SIL 3 Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional field devices in automation technology fail to meet the high safety requirements of SIL 3 standards due to the vulnerability of monolithic microprocessors in their evaluation units, which cannot reliably prevent dangerous errors and ensure the reliability of safety-critical applications like level monitoring in tanks.

Innovation Solution

The control/evaluation unit is designed with triple redundancy and a voter system comprising a comparator stage, error detection stage, and output selection stage, with each voter channel having double redundancy, ensuring that errors in measurement channels or power supplies do not compromise safety, and utilizing reconfigurable logic modules to dynamically adjust functionality based on application needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional monolithic microprocessor is used in the evaluation unit, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but the functional safety and reliability cannot meet SIL 3 standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional safetyVSAvoidevaluation unit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation unit is segmented into multiple independent measurement channels (at least three), each with separate signal processing paths. This segmentation allows the system to isolate and detect faults in individual channels while maintaining operation through redundant channels, thereby achieving SIL 3 safety levels without requiring a single complex microprocessor to handle all safety logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A voter unit is introduced as an intermediary component between the measurement channels and the output. The voter receives signals from multiple measurement channels, compares them, and determines the final output value. This intermediary structure enables fault detection and safety validation without requiring the main control microprocessor to directly handle safety-critical comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If redundant and diverse measurement channels are implemented, then the safety level is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidmeasurement channel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement channels are designed with universal functionality, where each channel can independently perform the complete measurement and evaluation function. This multi-functionality allows any channel to serve as the primary measurement path, while others provide redundancy. The voter unit universally compares all channel outputs, enabling flexible fault tolerance without requiring specialized hardware for each channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes in the measurement signals (magnitude, polarity, timing) to detect faults and validate measurements. By monitoring multiple parameters across redundant channels, the system achieves high safety levels through software-based fault detection rather than requiring additional complex hardware sensors or actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the voter unit compares output signals from multiple measurement channels, then error detection capability is improved, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidsignal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The voter unit continuously compares output signals from all measurement channels in real-time, performing error detection preliminarily before final output is generated. This preliminary comparison action allows the system to identify divergent signals and potential faults immediately, enabling rapid fault detection without adding significant processing delay to the measurement cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation unit is designed to rapidly process and compare signals through the voter logic, rushing through the comparison operation efficiently. The voter uses simple comparison logic that can quickly determine whether measurement channels agree or diverge, minimizing the time penalty associated with redundant signal processing while maintaining high error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentEP2875408B1Field device for determining or monitoring a process variable in automation technology
Publication Date: 2019.09.11 ENDRESS & HAUSER GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2875408B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2875408B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2875408B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

The invention relates to a field device for determining or monitoring a process variable in automation technology, wherein the field device satisfies a safety standard that is required in a predetermined safety-critical application, with a sensor (11) operating according to a defined measuring principle and with a control/evaluation unit (12) that processes and evaluates measurement data supplied by the sensor (11) along at least three measuring channels (MK) designed to be redundant and/or diverse, and wherein a voter (13) which consists of a plurality of components that are at least in part designed so as to be doubly redundant, is associated with the control/evaluation unit (12).